this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
54 points (82.9% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2843 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fart_pickle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Putting aside economical aspect, western civilisation in order to sustain itself, requires on average little above 2 children per household (can't find the link to the study). Such number would provide enough "man power" to replace aging work force and would keep society going forward. This is the perfect world scenario. Unfortunately we don't live in a perfect world and there's nothing current governments can do to change it. It would require a lot of work, money and time and no government will risk long term investment because it won't give much votes.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

All the Neo-Malthusian BS in this thread, holy crap. The "overpopulation is the problem" has got to be one of the best ways for governments, corpos, and the rich to deflect attention from their failures and excesses. Hands down even better than the "personal carbon footprint" propaganda.

  • earth has a resource distribution/use efficiency issues right now; the rich are greedy and wasteful.

  • don't want to have kids? Fine, don't! Kids deserve parents that want them, and you deserve your autonomy to live your life as more than a means to an end for demographics.

  • if governments addressed the resource hoarding and waste, more people who want to have kids would have them because they would have enough to have a good quality of life and standard of living, and we would also have addressed things like climate change and dystopic corpo control.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

Maybe we need more fucking and less babies. Fucking makes people happy for nearly free, just the price of condoms. To continuously depopulate, we would want to have deathbed parties for old fucks, or parties at the morg.

Maybe another pandemic? And we just ignore all we learned and we go around spitting on every door knob?

[–] TheBigBrother@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago

The depopulation plan it's going smooth..

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›