this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2023
51 points (98.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43944 readers
493 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Arctichawk1@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[–] SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

That cold water will boil faster than warm water.

It's a confusion. You should always cook with cold tap water, not hot, because hot tap water can contain excessive amounts of lead.

There are several instances where hot water can freeze faster than lukewarm water. I believe people saw this on shows such as Bill Nye and then forgot the specifics.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wait what's this about hot water and lead? I love me some hot showers, is it making me dumb?

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

I dunno if it contains lead so much as it contains extra minerals from sitting in your waterheater.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Russiagate https://jacobin.com/2020/04/russiagate-christopher-steele-dossier-trump-election

edit: all the people being mad and downvoting just goes to underscore that once people internalize nonsense, no amount of evidence will change their minds

[–] jadedctrl@jam.xwx.moe 1 points 1 year ago

That you shouldn't drink milk when you're sick. As it turns out, a bit of dairy won't kill you!

[–] meliache@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago
[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That people were killed in Tiananmen Square itself, that the soldiers were the first ones to kill, and that the death toll was something like 10,000. It gets played up on Reddit because of red scare propaganda and plain old chauvinism.

I wasn't going to say that at first [simply because it's a bit obnoxious] but since other people are courting drama and I was collecting links from another conversation so it's convenient to do, so I'll repost them here:

There was a great deal of violence and many students (along with other protestors, as well as the militants and soldiers) died, so I'll mark each link with an appropriate content warning, though that's mostly because the last one is rough, while the ones before it are unlikely to cause people issues.

First, here are video interviews with some of the former student leaders, the first one with Chai Ling actually being before the incident took place. There is some gunfire and yelling that a western news program uses for "ambience", but nothing is shown. Chai Ling describes a bloody scene, though that specific scene is patently fictional (this is established by the others who are interviewed).

Next is an article which discusses the subject, partly quoting student leaders above. It describes violence in broad strokes but doesn't have any pictures. It also talks about statements made by a British reporter who was there.

Third, here is secondary reporting leaked on documents from the US Embassy in Beijing and the actual report from a Latin American diplomat that was leaked. The latter revealing contains in its summary: "ALTHOUGH THEIR ACCOUNT GENERALLY FOLLOWS THOSE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED, THEIR UNIQUE EXPERIENCES PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INSIGHT AND CORROBORATION OF EVENTS IN THE SQUARE." (source text is all caps). There is very little description of violence, just mention of gunfire being present, people being wounded, etc.

{Caution} Lastly, here's an article written arguing that the event is misrepresented in mass media. I link it mainly because it includes photographic evidence that is very difficult to argue with for reasons beyond it being difficult to look at. Graphic depiction of stripped corpses of soldiers that were strung up after death.

Obviously there's more than this, but these were the links I collected recently. Chai Ling says things that are even more unhinged in footage I think they excluded from that excerpt of the interview.

[–] Goronmon@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

{Caution} Lastly, here’s an article written arguing that the event is misrepresented in mass media. I link it mainly because it includes photographic evidence that is very difficult to argue with for reasons beyond it being difficult to look at. Graphic depiction of stripped corpses of soldiers that were strung up after death.

"Here are photos that show things other than soldiers shooting civilians proving that soldiers didn't shoot civilians!" isn't as convincing as you might think it is. And wow, that article doesn't even pretend to not be straight up propaganda.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tubbadu@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] lightstream@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm gonna guess you're a Windows user :D

[–] tubbadu@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί