this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
257 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

1345 readers
139 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

A misguided bill that would have required many people to show ID to get online has died without getting a floor vote in the California legislature, where key deadlines for bill passage passed this weekend. Thank you to our supporters for helping us to kill this wrongheaded bill, especially those of you who took the time to reach out to your legislators.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago

What a stupid plan

[–] NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good, let’s keep it dead globally. This is never going to end well for anyone from any political side if this kind of thing gets implemented.

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

Greedy politicians will unfortunately continue the onslaught of these laws, until their plans are fulfilled.

The children they said, the children - All just a big wrapper for destruction of society by big greed.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago

Until 6 months from now

The problem is that we keep seeing these kinds of laws come back. Just look at chat control.

[–] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

We're celebrating too soon.

Looks like a law (SB 976) requiring ID verification for social media is heading to Newsom to be signed into law (but hopefully will get shut down?).

The exact kind of verification required isn't explicitly stated in the bill and would be up to Rob Bonta (CA Attorney General) to decide.

Of course Bonta uses the classic "think of the children, approach":

Bonta, on the other hand, encourages the public to think of the welfare of children at risk from social media addiction.

https://lemy.lol/post/30681030

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

California government gets it right way more often than wrong, since it went solidly Democrat. Not perfect, nothing can be, but leaning towards the correct direction. Here it is again.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They get right everything that is not pro-tech billionaires. All of that they miss 100% of time.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

California’s biggest blind spots are its biggest industries. But it still often does better than other states with these.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago

cuts to California police

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago

We're not Texas!

This bill brought to you by the WEF (via a few degrees separation)