this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
8 points (90.0% liked)

Hardware

55 readers
24 users here now

A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

But nobody knows the name of this company.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CarbonAlpine@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Isn't TSMC at like 7nm or some shit?

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 6 hours ago

The gate pitch of "7nm" is actually 54. Those tiny numbers are just marketing garbage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_nm_process

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 3 points 2 days ago

3nm I think. 65nm is 2005ish tech