this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
-12 points (31.2% liked)

Conservative

384 readers
65 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Instead, the overly broad definition and lack of any waiver authority in this bill would result in extremely harsh and unintended consequences including the removal of survivors of domestic violence.”>

Have your wife deported by beating her. Just as God intended.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Well if you're convicted... You're not a victim, you're a perpetrator.

The hyperbole here is off the charts. Can you be any more disingenuous?

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -5 points 2 months ago

Yeah conviction isn’t a minor thing but the left will still call them victims.

Not sure deporting them is the best option. Keeping them in prison would be better