this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
130 points (94.5% liked)

okmatewanker

626 readers
1 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French ๐Ÿคฎ

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] propter_hog@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Lovecraft was a xenophobic sack of trash and he shouldn't be adored by the cosmic horror crowd

[โ€“] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

TBH, he moved to the left in 1930s, being disillusioned with capitalism.

[โ€“] propter_hog@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, maybe, but his wife's biography of him paints a much different picture. It could be that her biography reflects just their time together, which would have been before the 30s.

[โ€“] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, in 1910s and 1920s he was very reactionary, but the Great Depression really helped him to change his mind.

[โ€“] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Politically yes, but it's well known his writing stayed pretty racist (even the later stuff). There's this funny trope that people with a Germanic last name are rarely evil in this writing, but Italian, Slavic etc last names are often depicted as bad people.

[โ€“] propter_hog@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

It's so pronounced that the people worshipping Cthulhu were often depicted more horrifically than actual Cthulhu. And it's obvious why: that was Lovecraft's biggest fear.

[โ€“] cook_pass_babtridge@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Still an extremely influential writer, you can't talk about cosmic horror without at least mentioning him.

[โ€“] propter_hog@hexbear.net 0 points 1 month ago

Certainly, and I love the greater Cthulhu corpus, but his work is extremely problematic.

[โ€“] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Separate the art from the artist. Many people who are shitbags produce good art and I can still enjoy the art without endorsing them. He was and is (and perhaps always will be) the GOAT in cosmic horror.

[โ€“] propter_hog@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Except that his art also contains racist bullshit

[โ€“] HeurtisticAlgorithm9@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The idiom "separate the art from the artist" actually means the opposite to that. It means that it doesn't matter what the artist intended, if it caused offense then it is still offensive. Rather than, it doesn't matter how much offensive stuff put into the art if I don't find it offensive then it's fine.

[โ€“] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago

That's not at all the commonly known meaning. It's differentiating the art from the actions or beliefs of the artists. I like plenty of art, music, literature, created by awful people, but that doesn't reduce the meaning or importance of their work.

[โ€“] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago

Pffft, I know you are but what am I?

[โ€“] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oi, weโ€™re not pallid!

[โ€“] Emperor@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago

I am, I'd argue I wasn't "fishlike".