this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
69 points (98.6% liked)

Games

16658 readers
609 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] choco@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Older titles should be restricted to +18 by default, at least they would stay purchasable.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't know if they can legally pretend it has a rating though

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

You are probably right but there has to be some kind of path forward baked into the regulations.

It will be a bit of a farce if retro gaming becomes illegal because no one submits the paperwork for 8-bit consoles.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Requiring new releases to provide this information going forward makes sense. But I expect a lot of older titles have no one actively paying attention to go get this paperwork filled out, and will get blocked as a result. This law should've just applied to everything new released after the law takes effect, grandfathering in legacy content.

[–] derekabutton@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

If nobody is paying attention, then nobody will care about not getting paid. It may sound disappointing, but I'm sure a German who wants something specific can find ways to get to it.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

... unless the customer is over 18, right? The age where an age rating doesn't fucking matter?

This is the same shit as Australia "refusing classification." Oh cool, guess it'll default to the highest bar to entry, oh no wait the whole thing was just an excuse to censor fictional people taking imaginary drugs.

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Man, the Germans have a history of taking L's.

[–] Mora@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is there a list (ideally sorted by rating) with affected games?

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Considering a lot of games on steam don't have a rating at all, it's probably going to affect damn near everything but AAA games, honestly

[–] Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No it fortunatly doesn't. The games don't need an USK (official german) rating. Steam seems to have it's own rating system which seems to be enough

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Ah, ok, that's not so bad then? Still pretty annoying though