this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
107 points (95.0% liked)

Programming

17511 readers
80 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yogsototh@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

purescript if you count “compile to js” as compiled.

Otherwise Haskell

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Elm, which is the loveliest language ever.

But I'm not sure if compiles to javascript counts as compiled, in which case haskell, which is considerably less lovely but still good.

Roc isn't finished, but it might turn out lovely, I don't know.

[–] lambda@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Transpiles :)

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[–] HiddenTower@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Scala is the the first I used and I like it a lot. If I had more time I'd love to give ocaml a decent try but I don't think I can get into it these days.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

C on Morello (or any other capability machine).

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

C++, with some Skill

/s

but seriously, I don't know any language with a good, C/Cpp-like Syntax (so not Rust), with a good compiler (again not Rust). So I'm sticking to Cpp.

[–] Hundun@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago

What's so bad about the Rust compiler? I know it's slow, but given all the analysis it's doing, it makes sense. And, from my own experience, setting correct optimization levels for dependencies along with a good linker makes incremental builds plenty fast.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] flubba86@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Buttons@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wouldn't consider Julia statically-typed; am I wrong?

[–] flubba86@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It's actually optionally-typed. But if you're liberal with type annotations you can treat it as statically typed.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›