Pixel Dungeon

1453 readers

9 users here now

This community is a place to talk strategies, tell stories, or discuss anything related to Pixel Dungeon or its many versions.

Rules:

1. No hate or adult themes of any kind: NSFW or illegal material, hate speech, personal attacks, harassment, doxxing, bullying, etc. are all strictly forbidden. Crude or offensive language should be kept to a minimum or avoided entirely.
2. Posts must directly relate to Pixel Dungeon: All content posted must directly reference Pixel Dungeon or one of its variants in some form. Loose connections or similar nomenclature from irrelevant works do not count.
3. Do not use other's work without giving credit: You may post things that were created by other people, but you must link to the original and credit the author. AI generated content is prohibited, as crediting the original authors is impossible.
4. Follow site-wide rules: https://legal.lemmy.world/fair-use/

We have a few title tags for standout posts:

[MOD] - Posts by moderators about the community
[DEV] - Announcements from a developer of a PD version
[OC] - Self-made original content

Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

00_Evan@lemmy.world

Zrp200@lemmy.world

Is this intended behavior for the journal? (lemy.lol)

submitted 1 month ago by dotplot@lemy.lol to c/pixeldungeon@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Shattered Pixel Dungeon- v2.5.2, desktop linux version from github

I am playing v2.5.2 on desktop instead of v2.5.3. This is mainly because I do not like the removal of the stone of disarming (and also because I do not like bombs, which seem too high-tech for medieval fantasy IMO). So it is possible that this issue was fixed on the desktop version of 2.5.3, if it is an issue. However, since I am on v2.5.2, I have not checked whether or not the behavior is the same on v2.5.3.

The journal cuts off floor 1 at the bottom of the screen. See the attached picture. Is this intended or unintended?

Thank you for your help.

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] TrashboxBobylev@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There was nothing noteworthy on floor 1.

Also, China (on question of bombs being too modern for middle ages).

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I assume it's empty like 10, 13, and 15, and not technically cut off? But I'm totally guessing there - I don't actually know what this is supposed to show.

[–] Vencedor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bombs have been in the game since who knows when. Also gunpowder was discovered in China, 2500 BCE, I think.

[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your violent made me curious, learned bombs are 11th century.

[–] Vencedor@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

1st: that's still medieval times 2nd: I said GUNPOWDER, not bombs. Bombs are made of gunpowder. Therefore, medieval bombs are possible. 3rd: Bombs are in other versions, so, I still don't know what that has to do with not updating. 4th: my violent? What does that even mean?

[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Chill dude.

Violent: autocorrect from comment.

My point.
Get a life and stop being a jerk.
Gunpowder is from the 9th century

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

As a 3rd party, the only one being a jerk here is you.

[–] Vencedor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

What point are you talking abt? When was I a jerk? As I alr said, 9th century are medieval times. Just because I disagreed with you (while you were actually wrong) doesn't mean that I'm a jerk lmao. I didn't call you dumb. Nor did I ever question your education. Why are you questioning me? Btw, that's an ad hominem fallacy, which disproves your point entirely.