this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
-5 points (43.6% liked)

Canada

7204 readers
340 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] k_rol@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

We don't really do anything for Thanksgiving in my family, never did. I'm fine with that, it's just a day off.

[–] fourish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had a bacon cheeseburger.

πŸ„ πŸ– πŸ’€

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Why so insecure? Why would you try to hurt people, human beings, for your own unexamined emotional needs?

[–] fourish@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

lol. Blocked.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Disturbingly, there are no federal regulations protecting turkeys and other farmed animals from horrific suffering while on farms

Is that true!? I moved here a few years ago from the EU. I certainly assumed Canada has them

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It is true. One of the noteworthy consequences is that animals can be shipped in open containers in -30C weather with no food or water. If they arrive all frozen to death, it's not a crime. There isn't even a fine. And so of course this is exactly what happens, and they do die.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago

Oh, it's bad. We can acknowledge their sentience, but if they are someone's property, product or nuisance, anything goes.

There are so many contradictions with animal protection laws that it makes your head spin.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

My family ate a couple of chickens instead. We made chicken fajitas. They were delicious.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago

When you create a child, whether you fuck it into existence, or whether you engage a surrogate to do it for you, it creates moral responsibilities between you and that child. We all acknowledge this.

The animals we create are morally equivalent to our own children. They are owed the exact same unconditional love and protection.

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Aside from the veganism/ antiveganism circlejerks, aren't animals that are raised in a more healthy way more tasty? And aren't injured and dead animals not consumed, therefore wasted and contributing to emissions despite not returning nutritional value?

Scaling down to more humane conditions is good for everybody.

Edit supposition corrected

[–] Yezzey@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Those turkeys would not even be alive unless someone was going to eat them.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whether never being born is or is not better than a brief and miserable life is the kind of thing philosophers like to argue aboutβ€”a question to which there is no generally accepted answer.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago

"Generally accepted" isn't meaningful in this situation. Slavery is a good example of something that was (and is) generally accepted, but clearly wrong. It is not even generally accepted here today that it is wrong to be needlessly cruel and violent to animals. Whether or not people ACCEPT it, it is obviously wrong. It is morally wrong to cause a sentient being to suffer unnecessarily, especially for our own pleasure. Creating a creature does not give you the moral right to take its life or subject it to harmful conditions, and @Yezzey is exercising philosophical wishful thinking.