this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
84 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59288 readers
3859 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fart_pickle@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I wonder how much Google spends on bribes?

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Less than a month to make a massive software overhaul was an insane order.

It cannot be safely done without actual lead time.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just another example of how judicial systems are run by ignorant dinosaurs who don't understand how anything works (e.g. series of tubes). You'd expect a judge presiding over this type of case to make a ruling after seeking advice from domain experts; on what was in the realm of possibility.

If Google were motivated to do this voluntarily, I'd expect it to be a 6-12 month project, at the very least.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I still don't see how there's a possible argument for making them actually distribute app stores, either.

Removing some of the (accurate) information that you need to trust an App Store to allow it to install and update apps, whatever. Limiting their ability to abuse their market dominance to control the behavior/hardware of phones that ship with them, great. But actually making them distribute content is wild.

[–] endofline@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

They are not exactly bribes. Rather undisclosed preferential consulting jobs or hiring promises. It's quite easy to follow money in bribes. It's somehow so: after they finish politics careers, they get hired as highly paid consultants for their preferential treatment when they were politics

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

Why bribe when you can threaten with leaking your search history haha.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago

The trouble with being a conspiracy theorist is you don't know when to stop. Not everything that happens is part of some grand conspiracy.

Calm down.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

Remember when they just gave basically a blank check to make this go away?

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

A good lawyer knows the law. A great lawyer knows the judge.