this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
717 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58877 readers
3582 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Don't stop at social media. Put that same limit on religion, too.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's norway, so that's kinda pointless

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 97 points 1 day ago (12 children)

"Are you 15 or more years old? Y/N"

There, that fixed the problem.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 28 points 1 day ago (10 children)

IIRC Norway has an actual Nat ID system, so assuming they develop a workable API for it ðis could actually be implemented quite easily.

Preventing kids stealing ðeir parents' IDs to open accounts anyway will be ð actual challenge.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 36 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Is there a reason that you use some character (I'm afraid I don't know the name of it) wherever you would otherwise use "th"? I can't guess if it's some kind of technical issue with federated text, something from a different language you're incorporating, or one of those "I think we should add x symbol to the language so I'll use it to draw attention to the effort" deals, like with the people that use the combined !? symbols whenever both are relevant at once.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 60 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's a thorn, a letter making a th sound. Still in use in Icelandic, I think. In English, it's archaic at best.

Fun fact, when it fell out of use, the letter Y was used to replace it for a while. So when you see something saying "ye olde", verbally it's still "the old".

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago

I actually always wondered about the y in old texts. Thanks!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

What ð heck are are you talking about, it looks normal. To me. Maybe ðeres someðing wrong wið your computer.

[–] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m probably doing exactly what they want here (e.g. having a conversation about it), but that letter is called “Eth” and was the Old English way of spelling the “th” sound: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eth

A number of linguistic buffs want to bring it back to the modern English alphabet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Oaksey@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

True but would you prefer weak enforcement or strong enforcement?
Strong enforcement would likely involve the government having better records of your browsing habits.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My government already knows all of my kinks, I include a list of all the porn I watched each year with my tax return. They don't ask for that, but I provide it anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)

I prefer weak enforcement every time. It's effective for kids who would follow the law anyway, and it doesn't push the kids to use more covert means if they wouldn't follow the law anyway. The latter group is therefore much easier to monitor using standard tools, and good parents with deviant children can use that effectively to help solve their problems before they become more serious.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] sandbox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If anything, it would be far better to ban people above a certain age from social media. I’ve seen far more older people get sucked in by online misinformation and become extreme conspiracy theorists than kids.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago (9 children)

It's not the government's job to tell adults to not partake in self-harm. Kids don't know better.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 21 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I really dislike this sort of daddy over reach but it seems like this is the only way to make corpos get real about enforcement.

This would result needing to provide ID to use normie social media?

How would this even work globally and on places like fediverse tho?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago (6 children)

How do they define what a social media is?

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (10 children)

And most importantly: How would they enforce that? Kids have been lying about their ages since the dawn of internet.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think they really need to.

Laws are often just an acknowledgement of a society's expectation.

"We've all decided that kids under 15 using social isn't great."

The fact that this law exists makes it infinitely b easier for parents to establish and maintain rules in their household, because peer pressure is minimised.

Yes, some kids will still use social before they're 15. Perhaps most kids. However, I think harmfully excessive use will be minimised.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›