this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
48 points (85.3% liked)

Linux

48200 readers
894 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm very curious of which distro users loves the most that they have it on their daily hardware?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Presi300@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] penguin202124@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

just works

After compiling and configuring for a few hours sure

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Fedora. Any kind.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 1 points 4 days ago

I use Bunsenlabs and like it a lot

[–] monovergent@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago

Debian Stable. Predictable, low-maintenance, and well-supported. From time to time, I think about switching over to Alpine or even BSD, but the software selection and abundance of Q&A posts for Debian and its derivatives keeps me coming back. Having been a holdout on older Windows versions in the past, I'm quite used to waiting for new features and still amazed at how much easier life is with a proper package manager.

[–] JustMarkov@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago

MX Linux is the best, obviously. Otherwise it wouldn't be #1 on DistroWatch, right? /j

[–] NewOldGuard@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago

I use fedora-based atomic distros for the reliability and security. Nothing else really runs SELinux out of the box and I care about security so that’s a necessary baseline. I roll my own distro though using BlueBuild, and base it off the SecureBlue image of Silverblue. Just using SecureBlue gets you nearly to what I use though

[–] icogniito@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

Arch (cachyos) on my desktop, Debian on my server.

Doesn’t really get any better than those two in my opinion

[–] bruhsoulz@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

I got arch cus its light af basically, id just install what i want/need myself

[–] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Screw distros, just use Arch

[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 days ago

And we all know Arch isn't a distro right?

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Personnaly, i'm using Fedora and i love it!

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

IIRC Torvalds uses Fedora.

(Debian for me.)

[–] shekau 2 points 4 days ago

IIRC Torvalds uses Fedora.

Me too

[–] jaxiiruff@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago

I really love NixOS and use it on all my devices. Its not as difficult as people say and it really makes the linux experience a piece of cake once you get it down.

The single config file to control almost everything is just what I was looking for in linux and the fact that it solved any kind of dependency hell I have experienced in the past is huge. If I had to list a top 3 it would be NixOS, Fedora, and Arch.

[–] je_skirata 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Arch because I like getting the latest releases of packages

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vinnymac@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I use Arch for personal and gaming, Debian for self hosting and hacking, Alpine for containerized cloud deployments.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] esteemedtogami@lemmy.one 16 points 1 week ago

I just installed Bazzite about a month ago and love it! Used Ubuntu in the past and it was ok, but eventually went back to Windows. I definitely don't feel that way about Bazzite though, I think I might stick with it as my primary OS!

[–] Rogue@feddit.uk 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nobody has mentioned immutables yet?!

I finally dipped my toes into trying a new distro over the summer and have been really impressed with Project Bluefin. All the familiarity of Gnome for existing Ubuntu or Debian users but with a completely hands off rolling update experience.

The main drawbacks are the slight complexity of how the fuck to install stuff on an immutable system. In theory you use Homebrew for CLI apps and flatpak for GUI apps but I'm really not a fan of installing from sources other than the original dev.

[–] NewOldGuard@hexbear.net 1 points 6 days ago

You can also run a distrobox and install stuff normally from whatever distro’s repos, then export the applications so they’re available like native. Works really seamlessly in my experience

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

Debian and Fedora. I use Debian on servers and Fedora on my desktop and laptop.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I use Gentoo and I love it. The installation process is a bit more complex than Arch but it doesn't have to be if you choose the precompiled kernel.

The package management is extremely flexible and the community are great. I have a morning routine where I log onto my gentoo desktop before work and update everything; would compare it to raking one of those miniature buddhist sand gardens. Very theraputic!

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Have got Debian on an old thinkpad too because it is too under resourced to compile everything. I think Debian is amazing for a solid, reliable distro if you have weak hardware.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Debian for my daily workstation. Minimal terminal-only install, and then I piece together my environment.

For smaller, headless applications I like Alpine. Containerized projects, VPS, etc.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Saoirse@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago

Until it doesn't /jk

If you need fresh version of some software, Flatpak is a nice solution.
You can also use Docker, it just works.

Props to the maintainers and developers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ndondo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

Endeavouraos, arch but also easy

[–] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There isn't a best distro, tho I stick to the root of a distro tree, meaning arch / debian.

[–] bruhsoulz@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Why are fedora and suse often not mentioned considering theyre not forks of anything? (as far as im aware)

[–] lancalot@discuss.online 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Historically, (at least for hobbyists/enthusiasts) Fedora and openSUSE have been a lot less popular compared to Arch, Debian and their derivatives. While not necessarily representative, Boiling Steam's chart -in which ProtonDB's data is used- does indicate to this as well.

Just my 2 cents.

[–] bruhsoulz@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Kinda crazy considering fedoras perks and accessibility tbh. Dont know much ab suse tho as i have very little experience with it

[–] lancalot@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know why, but openSUSE has had difficulty garnering popularity overall (aside from Germany).

A possible explanation, which also ties in to Fedora, is how both are the open source variants to corporate distros; SEL and RHEL respectively.

Arch and Debian are more community-driven by comparison.

For Fedora specifically, people couldn't regard it as anything but a testing bed distro; especially if you see how back2back they were with adopting new technologies like PulseAudio, systemd, Wayland, GTK 3/4, PipeWire etc. To be fair, openSUSE was the first to default to Btrfs and auto-snapshotting with Snapper*. Fedora was also facing competition from industry darling CentOS; similar code base, but a lot more stable.

Thankfully, since a couple of years now, Fedora has recognized that it's not cool to expect your user base to be sadistic. And together with the (unfortunate) downfall of CentOS, Manjaro and Ubuntu - Fedora has amassed a very healthy user base. And with how quickly Bazzite is becoming the face of gaming Linux (at least until Valve releases SteamOS), I don't think it has even peaked yet.

[–] bruhsoulz@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

steamos? its going to have its own release detached from the deck? thatd be so cool

[–] lancalot@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago

Yup; at least to some extent.

[–] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

I didn't mention them, because I simply haven't used them yet.

[–] Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago

Fedora Atomic, especially Bluefin, Bazzite and Aurora.

Nearly unbreakable, very reliable and stable in everyday use, needs no maintenance (updates itself, etc.) and more!

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Fedora, but I wouldn’t say I’m in love with it. It frustrates me the least. No Linux distro is perfect, but they’re all better than Windows.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

If there were a universal answer to this, there wouldn't be any others.

I myself currently use Debian (testing), have for some years now, but I have used other distros in the past too.

[–] Trent@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Xubuntu on my desktop/laptop, debian on a server. Mostly because while I really like tinkering with things, I usually just want shit to work so I can get something done.

[–] frankenswine@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[–] lancalot@discuss.online 7 points 1 week ago

Best Distro

Needs dictate preferences. An objective assessment isn't possible even on an individual level, as circumstances change over time. Linux Mint serves as a common starting point, with many users eventually 'graduating' to other distributions. The opposite is also true; many eventually return to low-maintenance distros like Linux Mint, preferring something that 'just works'.

I’m very curious of which distro users loves the most that they have it on their daily hardware?

I daily drive secureblue.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Nix and Bazzite

[–] paolab@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Opensuse Tumbleweed. Sometimes I try something else, but Tumbleweed is the one I keep going back to. It is quite solid and rolling release.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

OpenSuSE Tumbleweed is my current favourite. It's user friendly with good system tools in Yast, it's got good repos including community repos with lots of software.

Its also a rolling release but has been stable and reliable for me. Leap is their point release version if rolling is not right for you.

I've been using Tumbleweed for over a year, and it's my main OS since I stopped using windows. I've dual booted Linux for many years but always mained windows up until Tumbleweed.

Previously I used to use Mint; it's decent but switching to Tumbleweed (and in particular KDE) convinced me to completely switch from Windows. Everything "just works", and I do a fair bit of gaming without issue with nvidia drivers, steam, and lutris.

For example I've been playing Stardew, Cyberpunk 2077, Distant Worlds 2, and Factorio recently - all in Linux and all without issue.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

The best for my user cases atm

For work bluefin For general stations mint For gaming cachyos or bazzite

[–] Celediel@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

Gentoo, because no other distro offers as much choice.

[–] Rakenclaw@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think Pop!_OS and Linux Mint are the best no brains required distributions.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›