They're not behind the trilogy, they're behind the shitty remasters of the trilogy.
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
67 points (100.0% liked)
Games
16742 readers
705 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
There's a decent amount of evidence that they weren't given the time they needed by Rockstar, that they intentionally shipped it out with a shit ton of behind the scenes files in an attempt to assist modders (at the very least it was shoved out the door so fast they didn't have time to clean the files out of the release directory, holy shit), and members of the studio have repeatedly and consistently reported that they were not permitted by Rockstar to release many bug fixes after the remasters released.
Rockstar holds the biggest blame for this one.
Hundreds of fixes when the game needed 500 more and they just stopped updating..
Shareholders: Look, line goes up! That's great!
Reality: showing graph of number of reported bugs.
If rockstar and grove street games are distancing from each other the latter probably needs to rebrand.
Again. They rebranded for these remasters already, lol.