I got this reCaptcha on archive.is and it is too ironic not to share.
I mean it did blur their faces
this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
196 points (97.6% liked)
Privacy
32023 readers
1369 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
It did. But it is pretty safe to assume these ladies did not give consent to be used in a training data set.
Inb4 trump uses recaptcha to crowd source identification of queers and undocumented folks for persecution
This is completely unrelated, but now is a good time to get into shooting paintball guns at pieces of circular glass about 2 cm in diameter.
i wonder how much longer i'll be able to move about without face detection being able to spot me because my complexion is too dark.
Not for much longer. Everything is going to be based on facial recognition soon. The only way to fix it is to ban the thing altogether.
in the very recent past facial recognition didn't work well if your complexion was dark enough and mine is, but i don't know if that's true anymore.
It depends on how good the camera and the software are. They're constantly getting better. And if the software is complex enough, even wearing a mask won't help because the software may tag and track you because you're different to everyone else in that case.
i hope that the spirit of capitalism in my country will create entire industries of masks, makeups, glasses, and clothes that are capable of defeating face recognition.
Nah there's no market for that really and it's also illegal in some countries (idk about the US).
not yet and that's why the black market and the dark web exist.
it's impossible for the police's human eyes to detect that your glasses or your makeup is capable of reflecting the light that face recognition needs to identify you; at least for now.
It's already banned in EU in public spaces.
BUT
I've read those news a while ago so I don't remember if there were any shady exceptions or don't know if there were any changes made to it with time.
It's already banned in EU in public spaces.
Which is honestly terrible. I know it's the "it helps reducing crime by 0.1%" situation but it's just not a great decision for healthcare. Public places are the only places where you do need a mask if you have a serious infection (COVID or not).
I meant the facial recognition thing. Or am I misunderstanding your response?
I thought you were talking about masks because that was the last thing I was talking about in this thread.
The fact that FR is banned there is pretty surprising to me considering the direction the EU is going now.
Oh well, I'm just checking this stuff again and this act ended up having big exceptions. Everything's still shit.
Now that's more like the good old EU.
I despise cameras.