this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
355 points (96.6% liked)

World News

39082 readers
2960 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The measure received 14 votes in favour, with the US the sole member to reject it. However, because the US is a permanent member of the council, it has the ability to veto any resolution brought forward

Unlike several previous resolutions regarding a ceasefire in Gaza, Wednesday's measure was brought forward by all 10 elected members of the Security Council.

The US has vetoed four previous attempts at calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, on most occasions being the lone vote against the measures.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago

Why are they even allowed to vote over their own war? Oh I meant Israel's. My bad.

[–] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

Anyone who can't see America's true colours by now is simply refusing to look

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Is there any future where the Security Council is abolished?

Like, where everyone gets tired of this shit from the U.S, Russia, and China, and Europe uses their weight to end it?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The thing about the UN generally, and the Security Council in particular, that people don't understand it that its principal isn't to end war globally, but to end global war.

The Permanent 5 members of the security Council and their veto power are a huge part of why it's been sucessful. The veto prevents the UN from engaging in military actions against the interests of a nation that can withstand an extended military conflict with the rest of the world.

And it has worked remarkably well so far. While military conflict and imperialism are still around, the scale of conflicts have significantly decreased. The superpowers no longer engage in direct military conflicts that kill 50 million people, and when one gets uppity the rest of the world.engages in economic and diplomatic isolation instead of war.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

The UN has had nothing to do with contributing to the trend you have described. As unpleasant as it is, that is almost entirely a result of nuclear deterrence.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So that "Ceasefire" talk under Harris was bullshit eh?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

No way to know, she never will be president, nor have had say in any of it.

[–] MellowYellow13@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

She is literally vice president, and also had Q&As with the population saying she is in full support of Israel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 104 points 1 day ago (23 children)

🤔

Bruh

Lame duck presidency and can't even do the right thing

Ducks aren't even this lame

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shows he and the Democratic leaders never intended to end the genicide. Just another sign the democrats no longer support anyone but the oligarchy. Yes the Republicans are worse by alot but people that are anti genicide, anti oligarchy, anti fascism, anti authoritarianism, etc don't have a party to vote for. Only the level of oppression they will see in the next 4 years.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Imagine a person having to choose between losing 2 of their limbs or losing all 4 limbs.

Democrats are basically the ones wanting to cut off 2 of your limbs

Republicans want to cut off all your limbs.

Thats what is is. I mean I voted against the party that wants to cut off 4 of my limbs, but I'm just sad that there isn't a party (that can actually win elections) that is saying "we don't cut off any of your limbs".

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 24 points 1 day ago (13 children)

As long as you keep voting limb cutters, they have no motivation to stop cutting limbs. Not voting for limb cutters is the only way to make non limb cutting get on the ballot

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Me: why orphan crushing machine?

You: because other orphan crushing machine driven by Nazies.

Me: but why don't we destroy orphan crushing machine?

You: because orphan crushing machine go burrrrrrrrr

Me:...........

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (7 children)

What absolute pieces of shit. Can't even bother to do the right thing when it doesn't even matter anymore.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wtf is wrong with these people. I only voted for them bcz the alternative is a fascist piece of shit. I fucking hate this country.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›