this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
1623 points (99.9% liked)

Technology

72425 readers
2656 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

First U.S. nuclear reactor built from scratch in decades enters commercial operation in Georgia::ATLANTA — A new reactor at a nuclear power plant in Georgia has entered commercial operation, becoming the first new American reactor built from scratch in decades.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HR_Pufnstuf@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

With today's contractors? Good luck with that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] realitista@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

Yes! More of this please!

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (14 children)

Nuclear is expensive and dangerous to life. It should be avoided going forward.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago

Still way less deaths compared to what fossil fuels already did to us (not to mention the rest of nature), like cancer, mining related nastiness including transport, etc. Also there is more radioactive pollution from coal than nuclear plants (bcs of the volume & exhausts dumped into the air).

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] quazar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I understand the need for nuclear. We HAVE to stop using carbon emitting forms of energy.

But I have never supported nuclear in the United States. Time and time and time again, history shows that corporations will water down the regulations around an industry. To the point of collapse. The problem is, when nuclear goes bad, its REALLY bad.

We can't even get our fucking TRAINS to their destination without greed derailing them.

how many fucking oil spills have we had because of lax safety? remember the Deepwater Horizon oil spill? that was due to lax safety regulations, all in the name of profit.

Please, tell me:

Why in the flying fuck should I trust the regulations around nuclear energy to hold?

Whatever you say, I'm not going to believe you. Not until the fucking lawyers of the corporations stop writing the laws for the congressmen to sign without reading or understanding.

What the FUCK is going to stop 'big nuclear' from re-writing regulations?

I want the regulations around nuclear to be so tight, no capitalist will want to operate under it. I want several rubber bands and a vice around the balls of whoever is running it.

I even think maybe corporations can't be trusted with it, and all nuclear energy should fall exclusively under the management of the DoD.

[–] diablexical@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

I’d push back that US regulatory bodies are strong and successful in some areas and that nuclear power doesn’t necessarily need to fall under regulatory capture. Consider the FAA - not perfect but does a pretty damn good job of keeping the skies safe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I want to do more research in Thorium reactors. They are much safer than uranium.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Zstom6IP@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

This is great.

[–] czarrie@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

We had tried this in SC in expanding one of our sites from one to three. It did not go terribly well.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›