this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
134 points (99.3% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2673 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

European allies in the Baltic region are investigating how two fiber-optic data cables were severed earlier this week, with suspicion falling on a Chinese vessel in the area. Germany has said the incident was clearly sabotage.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] corroded@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (7 children)

This makes me wonder why the point of this was. What does China gain by severing a communications cable? Traffic is just going to be re-routed over other links, so all they're really doing is marginally slowing down internet connectivity in the region.

Is this just a way to send a message that they're willing do damage communication infrastructure?

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also a way to gauge our response

Like they’ve been doing to taiwan for decades. Slowly pushing lines further, sending more and more jets closer to the island etc.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 7 points 23 hours ago

I'm not sure the Chinese are to blame the captain was Russian.

[–] dlatch@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To show they can. It's a signal to Europe that they know where our infrastructure is and that they can get to it.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

It's a signal to Europe that they know where our infrastructure is

...it's public information

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

It could also be a test run for a future mission.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago

A bit of intimidation, sending a message, for sure.

[–] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s weird. But I also remember how many were quick to point to Russia for blowing up a pipeline and much later it turned out Russia had nothing to do with it.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -2 points 9 hours ago

yeah... no. it was Russia.

The Ukrainian that was wanted for this crime was captain of a vessel that was far too small to handle all the diving equipment and explosives needed to do the damage that was sustained.

[–] whithom@discuss.online -3 points 1 day ago

Preventing its increasing dissent by cutting off access to the outside world and painting a picture of china how they want its people to see.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

...no it isn't, it's anchored in the Kattegat. What's it with Americans and geography.

"The vessel was anchored in the Caribbean, ten miles east of Charleston" is what you sound like.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] card797@champserver.net 1 points 10 hours ago

Oh my God. Can you believe he said that?!

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee -2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The publication is American. Either he knew better and the editor "corrected" him as to "not confuse" the audience or he didn't, or didn't care to double-check, which just means that VOA has no standards when it comes to their correspondents knowing geography. Or their editors, who should catch such obvious mistakes.