this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
29 points (73.8% liked)

Asklemmy

44124 readers
432 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have an economics teacher that made this claim in class yesterday. I wanted to know other people’s thoughts about it.

(page 2) 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I haven't taken an econ class in 8-9 years but I remember it saying there's no such thing as a free lunch. Someone has to pay for it. And when you frame things in that light, then yes I could see how an econ teacher would call that stealing.

But econ is a weird science, it's explaining human behaviors and people are weird.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

One party's debt is another party's asset.

So yes, cancelling a debt looks the same as stealing cash in the issuing party's bookkeeping.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›