this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

TechNews

4068 readers
1 users here now

Aggregated tech news.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

[ sourced from The Verge ]

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Mark Gurman writes in his Power On newsletter for Bloomberg today that the more affordable follow-up to the Apple Vision Pro will “likely” ditch the external display to help it reach an internally-discussed price point between $1,500 and $2.500.

Gurman also reiterates what he wrote in June — that the more affordable version will probably run on an iPhone-grade chip, have fewer cameras, and get lower-resolution screens inside.

Ditching the external display means Apple would lock one of the Vision Pro’s marquee features — EyeSight — behind the paywall of the more expensive versions.

EyeSight is the thing that lets you see an on-the-fly render of the wearer’s eyes so they can “look” at you when you’re talking to them, and so you can tell, at a glance, if they’re occupied or if they’re actually seeing what’s in front of them.

Gurman writes that in deciding to prioritize getting a friendlier-priced version out into the world, Apple shifted people to that and away from its technically-challenging AR glasses project.

Especially if the company has any hopes about drawing in people who haven’t yet decided if they want this sort of thing in their life — a challenge that’s far from unique to Apple.


The original article contains 245 words, the summary contains 203 words. Saved 17%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!