I might try the Fluxbox version because my pc only has 4gb non upgradeable RAM and Ubuntu is using almost 2GB just to run at idle with no apps running.
Anybody have experience with MX?
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
48216 readers
1476 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I use the XFCE version, it's around 400 MB idle, fluxbox should be even less I think.
Wow, that's very low. I made a live usb of MX XFCE and one of Fluxbox. Running off the usb XFCE was using around 675mb and Fluxbox seeing 450. I then also tried Linux Mint Cinnamon and it was running at 745mb idle.
Fluxbox was a like too bare bones for me, XFCE was nice but Cinnamon is even nicer so for just an extra 200mb I went with Cinnamon. It's using less than half of what Ubuntu does and gives me everything I need.
But I think I'll run MX in a KVM VM just to use it, get used to it and see whether I might prefer it long term. I like that it uses less systemd.