this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
1456 points (97.2% liked)

Memes

46038 readers
2236 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I think capitalism is fine in principle, but like anything else that needs limits and rules that people are willing to enforce.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I'm on the fence about this, because as far as I understand, the regulatory mechanisms that end up serving as the limitations you're talking about are actually contrary to the system's core principles.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (8 children)

No, everyone doesn't hate capitalism.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

but everyone hates the big companies and the rich people

its just that the right has been told that the left are the rich people (and then the left say that the neoliberals are the rich people, etc)

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Do you think the problem with big companies and rich people is that individual rich people and the CEOs they elect just happen to be bad people?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's partially because like many other words and names (just consider Isis, an important goddess of ancient egypt), "socialism" to most people means the type of absolute control that communist countries usually feature. But of course, as a word/concept, socialism is just the application of socialist policies, not even remotely alluding to some absolute end goal or so. And naturally as a part of society except a tiny minority at the top, most people would benefit from more socialist policies.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›