this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
1160 points (95.6% liked)

Privacy

37245 readers
460 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new "king"

Update: position got backed up by an official Proton post on Mastodon, it's an official Proton statement now. https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503

Update 2, plot-twist: they removed this response from Mastodon - seems they realize it exploded into their face!

(page 12) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

One thing that this entire situation has done for me is to make me feel more justified in my posture of never paying a subscription for an online service if I can avoid it. So far I'm using Proton stuff for the free tier only, so I can have some degree of relaxation in evaluating any alternatives withotu also having to worry about banking stuff.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Do you realize that this means supporting an ad-driven business model (in general, for proton your ability to use the services for free is thanks to paying users), which in turns is what incentives data collection and privacy violations, right?

Also mail has a slightly higher moving cost than other services, where "changing" is usually three clicks to cancel the subscription and be done with it.

So my take is that (if you can afford it) paying for services incentivises healthy business models for services, that helps develop tools that don't harm users (to serve advertisers). The alternative is worse than paying money to a company with a guy who expressed an opinion we disagree with IMHO, but you do you.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atro_city@fedia.io -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is this really the CEO of proton? Is there a link to the tweet?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 months ago

Im glad I dont use any of their products

[–] sakuragasaki46@feddit.it -1 points 3 months ago

If for "little guys" Proton CEO intends minors, we are cooked 🤦

Also, top 10 anime plot twists

[–] hmmm@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As a non-american I don't care. I will not move anywhere.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago
[–] italics2@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It's ridiculous how many people just go "oh well time to dump Proton" because of a picture (not even a link) of a tweet without context. Also the title is misleading. Andy Yen in this picture is complementing Trump, and also apperently posting facts about who started the antitrust actions. "Embracing" is, really, as I have written, misleading.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›