this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
679 points (92.2% liked)

Comic Strips

13239 readers
3112 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2015/06/01/defend-say/

"I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CircuitGuy@lemmy.world 20 points 5 hours ago

Defending the right to unpopular and offensive speech is not the same as compromising with the speech. You can truly abhor what someone's saying and not try to some them.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, so then do you really want the Trump administration deciding on what speech to ban? Freedom of speech isn't just about defending monsters. It also can save us from them.

[–] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml -5 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

This is the fundamental issue with people arguing against free speech: I can never tell if they know they behave fascisticaly or not. Are they ignorant, or do they know?

This past election was very eye-opening in that everyone on the left was so absolutely confident that Trump wouldn't win. So much so they had already started laying things out for their own fascist takeover.

And yes, the left can act in a fascist manner.

[–] Holyginz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Tell me you don't know what fascism is without actually saying it.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 hours ago

This is the fundamental issue with people arguing against free speech: I can never tell if they know they behave fascisticaly or not. Are they ignorant, or do they know?

People who support censorship always believe the censors will always side with their preferences. They never consider what happens when people they oppose control the censors, and for them merely not having allied censors in place feels like they are being silenced (see conservative Christian types who inevitably get angry any time Christian-focused language isn't enforced [aka War on Christmas or anyone else requesting a display when there's a public religious display on government property]).

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

Remember that bill that would strip non-profit status from any group, based on the whim of the president? With no hope of appeal? That was very popular with Democrats, until Trump won.

Even if you assholes don't abuse something like that, you know that you aren't going to be in office forever? There's an election every 4 years, remember?

Don't go conflating Democrats with the left, though. There's some overlap, but they aren't the same.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The comic is actually self contradictory, because the top-left panel satirizes being tolerant with Hitler, while the bottom left satirizes accepting some wars. No wars would mean letting Hitler just go around annexing countries and creating concentration camps wherever he wants.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

There's a big difference between defending your country within your borders and crossing a border to fight in another country.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hitler will be defeated in the marketplace of ideas.

[–] mke@programming.dev 5 points 5 hours ago

Surely, as he was in reality. I'll be paraphrasing this, thanks.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 18 points 18 hours ago

"The Marketplace of Ideas" is such a scam, all that phrase accomplished was getting Bill Nye to debate creationists, who then gained followings because "The TV Box said that the Creationism and Evolution are equal ideas worth debating and considering the merits of!"

Don't let them make you think that Piss belongs on the shelf with Pepsi.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 26 points 1 day ago

Insistence on classic freedom of speech doesn't mean centrist, moderate, or apolitical. It means supporting civil liberties without being an ignorant hypocrite that takes those hard-fought liberties for granted. There was a whole movement that was pivotal to the civil liberties movement.

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] Whateley@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago

I once saw a guy on Twitter who edited the second panels compromise sign to say "You're both fucking stupid". He used it as his profile banner.

People like this actually exist in real life.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

not taking a side, is taking the side of inaction, which will inevitably result in oligarchy. You can say you don't care, withdraw, and refuse to participate, but don't pretend like it's not an active participation. You're actively in this life, you're just choosing to let the wrong team win.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Most people will choose the side of inaction as long as they're comfortable enough. That's something I don't get with today's oligarchs. They are just as stupid as they are greedy. If they hoarded just a bit less -- if they were willing to live a lavish post-scarcity lifestyle while having as much money as a SMALL country rather than living a lavish post-scarcity lifestyle while having as much money as a midsize country -- they could live the exact same day to day existence without the working class being up in arms and in love with CEO assassins.

In the movie of their life, the only difference would be the "high score" text at the top of the screen.

But I guess if you value a practical good life over unchecked avarice and ego, you probably aren't cut out for the oligarch lifestyle.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The moral purists are lashing out with hyperbole since the Israel/Hamas ceasefire has castrated their big issue. They have to pretend letting Trump win by refusing to vote for Harris cuz she "supported genocide" was still the right thing to do, and they weren't just being impatient toddlers demanding a cookie RIGHT NOW. Apparently they don't understand that diplomacy isn't something you can just click on.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›