this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
543 points (98.6% liked)

Fediverse memes

660 readers
649 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago

Spy sappin mah sentry!

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

It is currently called the United States of America

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 36 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Is it even a competition?

Afaik, lemmy doesn't compete. It just exists, and makes no effort as an entity to expand.

I'm not even sure if there are individual instances that do anything to seek out users, much less try to take them from other places.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

I just bought a domain name yesterday with plans to create an instance for my local county. My killer idea is to have a comminity in the instsnce called "the good old days" where older folks can post their stories. I noticed that is a popular thing on facebook. The instance will not be federated as I don't want anything but content which is relavent to the county. It should be somewhat self regulating given the topic limitations. I probably won't even mention federation unless someone else wants to make an instance specific to a certain town or something. Just a way to filter out all the noise on facebook where people can see all tge different news outlets and events from accross the county without being filtered by fb et al.

[–] Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I kinda wish they did so Reddit diasppears

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 45 minutes ago

No, if there's too hard of a push to get users then lemmy earns itself a bigger gun behind the crosshairs that are already aimed it (by platforms like Reddit).

If we have any hope of growing Lemmy into what it can eventually be, we need the growth to be gradual. As painstaking and aggravating as that might be.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

There is no "they" really - it's up to us as users to promote it.

[–] Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

With "they", I meant the owners/mantainers, specifically. Without some promotion from their part, there aren't so much users to promote it further.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

It’s crazy to me how there’s percentage of gamers who think this guy is THEIR billionaire, and this is THEIR game corporation, and it somehow makes it different or more ethical than all the other billionaires and corporations.

[–] raskolnikov@lemm.ee 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

In a world where enshitification is the norm, the bar is so low that keeping a product with good quality is enough to be deified by some. But surely those gamers that worship Gabe just do it for the memes right? (Don't answer)

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 11 points 11 hours ago

Valve being privately owned rather than having external shareholders probably helps them go for something sustainable rather than pushing for growth at all costs.

[–] liyunxiao@sh.itjust.works 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It's simply because the product is far superior to all other solutions on the market.

Not due to tricks, or marketing, or any weird strategies, but by simply solving the distribution problem for both the developers and consumers.

Yes all billionaires need to give up their wealth or literally be eaten, and all capitalism is inherently evil, but if we were to rank evil from least to most as especially liberals do in all other circumstances, then gaben and steam are on the least evil side of the spectrum.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Parasocial relationships get fucky

[–] Fleur_@lemm.ee 7 points 18 hours ago

The only brand loyalty I have is that their shit just works

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 18 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

As soon as the fediverse becomes an actual threat, the ban hammer is going to come down on anonymous social media

I'm honestly surprised it hasn't happened yet

[–] B312@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

It’s still pretty niche as of now

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 18 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

It would probably be something like: "any social media site made available to US users must verify user identities and legal name and age and comply with US agencies' requests for user information. Violators will be subject to penalty, including but not limited to economic sanction and imprisonment"

Yes, there would be ways around it and yes, there would be nations who would not enforce it, but there being legal barriers to operating an instance would basically kill its adoption for normal users. I'm really tired of people saying 'you can just get a vpn' as if most people would go to any length at all to share memes with friends. The fediverse is already too complicated for most people to adopt before having to circumvent region blocks.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Australia is already trying something like this, under the guise of protecting kids. Under 16 year olds are banned from social media starting in December, which is effectively the same as forcing identity verification. Don't know if Lemmy will be affected or not. But I'll ditch this account over giving my ID to "random dude running an instance".

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 hours ago

UK occasionally talks about this kind of thing too. Recently had something come in that caused some web forums to shut down as it was unenforceable for a small forum but the big companies will either comply, pretend to comply or pay/ignore the fines.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like that would probably Streisand effect

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Which would increase their effort to chase it down and make regular people avoid it.

Not that it would deter you, but the network would essentially stop growing and no longer be a real competitor

[–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Couldn't have social media without Americans.

Actually wait yes can we apply this to Lemmy?

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 2 points 18 hours ago

Ordinarily I would be sensitive to accusations of america-centrism, but the US has a tendency of bullying their allies into following their regulatory measures so I don't think this is just a US problem.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 hours ago

I guess we will see, maybe.

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 2 points 21 hours ago

wasn't there a thing about almost all instances being hosted on Hetzner?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m not sure but it’s been working wonders for desktop Linux for the technically inclined.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 19 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Weeeeell, as someone who moved from windows to Mint a few weeks back, Steam and proton have had a big hand in that, so I wouldn't say it's a good example of "doing nothing".

Edit: granted, Microsoft constantly shooting their own feet doesn't help, but Steam broke the cage by providing what was missing.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Not to downplay what Valve and all of the countless Linux contributers are doing and have accomplished, but I wouldn't be on Linux if Windows hasn't gone to shit.

I was basically a 30 year long Windows fanboy. It got so bad that it drove me away. And now I'm a Linux fanboy.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

And for Valve.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

“Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake."

—Napoleon Bonaparte

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The side fucking up is called "the art of the deal"

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 4 points 23 hours ago

They could avoid taxes on the proceeds with the deal of the art.

[–] NewDark@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

The China method

[–] Oth@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stability, reliability, don't fix it if it ain't broke.

Some companies have a need to reinvent them every 6 months to justify some middle Manager's existence so they can pad their resume for the next overpaid job position.

This Is what it looks like when you don't have that problem

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Accurate. There's significant overlap between Fediverse managers, developers, and users. Everyone's goals for the platform are always closely aligned.

[–] fourexample@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This actually just describes the main problem in almost every industry these days. Companies are so large and have so many people running them that at each rung of the ladder, priorities are completely different since it's impossible for someone in middle management to have any clue what's going on in manufacturing, or vice versa.

Then all of them get overshadowed equally by the monetary priorities of the CEO.

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

And if they gain a monopoly, they're able to separate their priorities from those of their users. That's when the enshitification begins.

[–] brillotti@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Doing it the Valve way.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Often in the daodejing also called wei wu wei: "acting without action" or "doing without doing"

Truly: this is The Way

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

The only winning move is not to play.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

Anti-Skibidity fr fr no cap

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 2 points 23 hours ago
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago

"Neutral jing".