Labour

7800 readers

1 users here now

One big comm for one big union! Post union / labour related news, memes, questions, guides, etc.

Here Are Some Resources to help with organizing and direct action

:red-fist:

And More to Come!

If you want to speak to a union organizer, reach out here.

:iww: :big-bill: :sabo:

Rules:

Follow The Hexbear Code of Conduct.
No anti-union content, especially from the right. Critiques and discussions of different organizing strategies is fine.
Don’t dox yourself or others.
Labour Party content goes in !electoralism@www.hexbear.net, !politics@www.hexbear.net, or a :dumpster-fire:.

When we fight we win!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

pizzaTheHutt@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

SerLava@hexbear.net

No NLRB? No Problem (industrialworker.org)

submitted 1 month ago by RedWizard@hexbear.net to c/labour@hexbear.net

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/54890600

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] edge@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Overall good article, but this bit seems self defeating:

It would be great if labor took action overnight, but due to these contractual traps, undoing labor’s habits is more likely a long term project. Unions need to be rebuilt from the ground up, by the rank & file, in a way that preserves the freedom to strike. Then we will have the freedom to move in situations like this.

The idea is to no longer comply with the government system designed to neuter unions, but we can't do it yet because of union contracts with the government? Basically capitulating the main point from the very start.

[–] dustcommie@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't think it is saying "oh they can't because they have a contract that says they can't", especially based off the context of the rest of the article. I think it is basically saying unions don't really have class conscience or militancy and are more worried about getting a contract even if that includes "signing away" your right to strike and have generally been tamed. Then it is saying that unions need their own "mini revolutions" where they wouldn't even rely on contracts(and have the capacity and organization to fight without relying on and being tamed by the NLRB) but that is likely a long term project. Basically, being critical of how many unions work and them relying on contracts but breaking this "habit" won't happen overnight.