this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
1007 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

58306 readers
4480 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 11 months ago

As web browsers are now free in price, if they are not privacy and freedom oriented the only way to promote them is by nagging and force.

[–] S3verin@slrpnk.net 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IverCoder@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago

Linux equivalent: Imagine if AppImageD pops up asking for your opinion and feedback on AppImages whenever you visit Flathub or Snapcraft.

[–] hiramfromthechi@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

If I was Microsoft, I'd wanna know too. After all, it's a race for every single one of our data points, and then some.

Either way, you gotta admit it's ironically funny that Microsoft wants to keep/poach Chrome users into their own... wait for it... Chromium-based browser.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 0x2d@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

What happens when you try to download Firefox?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cipher22@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I.e. Microsoft is looking to build an antitrust suit against Google.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 months ago (13 children)

I wouldn't turn this into a Firefox vs chrome(ium) fight,but why would anyone use a reskinned chrome(edge) over the original one? Not being sarcastic, I'm genuinely curious.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] thefloweracidic@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I think one huge issue is that edge is fine, it is a browser that works. There is nothing competitively interesting about it to make people consider switching, plus there is the infamy of IE and Micro$oft's reputation to contend with.

They should just develop a lightweight browser installer and bow out of the browser wars.

[–] pathief@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That will never happen, a browser is probably the best telemetry source you can possibly have. Microsoft wouldn't dream to give that up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If they are actually interested in the results, I think this is way better than the straight up nag screen they used to have.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I don't get why everyone is appalled by this. They're just quantifying user feedback. Long as they don't stop you from downloading chrome, and the feedback is optional, I don't see the harm

[–] elscallr@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Appalled? No.

Annoyed? Yeah.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I'm not really appalled. Just find it notable that Microsoft has four click throughs to try to nudge people towards Edge. Seems almost like desperation

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›