this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
84 points (76.9% liked)

Fediverse memes

966 readers
775 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you want a good one, !support@lemmy.world has an interesting thread

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Aha, I finally rediscovered the source of this comment:

We are discussing the request for defederation, but the consensus is that this may not be needed, since the 0.19 Lemmy update is expected to roll out in the upcoming weeks. This update will also enable users to block whole instances, and hopefully, address a big chunk of the issue we seem to be having here.

The original seems to have been deleted. The comment did not age well, since instance blocking turned out to be more of community muting, and even what little bit it did was later rolled back, allowing the users to trigger notifications by replying to your comments and for you to see all such communications. i.e. it is not a "block" of the "instance" at all, yet apparently the merest whisper that such a block might come in the then-future caused the entire Fediverse to avoid blocking places such as lemmy.ml and hexbear.net and lemmygrad.ml for over a year.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

the merest whisper that such a block might come in the then-future caused the entire Fediverse to avoid blocking places such as lemmy.ml and hexbear.net and lemmygrad.ml for over a year.

It sounds just like the effects of Elon announcing the hyperloop.

1 announce new tech that solves all the problems

2 don't give a release timeline

3 profit, due to delay

4 the people you lied to finally figure out the problem solving promises were actually lies.

I think we should call this type of scheme hyperlooping

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not sure if Lemmy is large enough to attract a realistic disinfo campaign, but on the other hand it's probably ingrained so deeply that it's basically habit reflex, and you never know what might pay out in the future, like perhaps the ability to maybe swing an election or two if you can encourage some people to ah... not vote maybe?

Bc according to some, bOtH sIdEs SaMe:

img

[–] squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm not being charitable, but I think they're saying the recent hexbear thing is HB, .ml, and lemmygrad trolling, and they're all russian bots.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They're not all Russian bots.

The internet is full of these obscure micro-cultures. The themes are different, but everything else is the same, comprised of the same type of person/mind.

Insecurities are easy pickings, just make them feel belonging and they'll be washed in no time. But make sure you empower them to identify that it's not them who are weak, it's "everyone else." That way when they're challenged, they lash out and are rewarded with more sense of belonging; get to a self-sustaining level.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

None of us are Russian bots, the admins of any instance would notice. Hell HB wasn't even federated for 4 years. Do you think Russia was running a bot farm that wasn't connected to anyone outside of the farm?

But liberals find it easier to accuse anyone to their left of being a bot than question their own views.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago

That's what a Russian bot would say

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 weeks ago

Unless of course ... the admins of your instance are also Russian bots.

[–] protist@mander.xyz -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you just float the idea of Russian bots and then accuse "liberals" of floating the idea of Russian bots? You're the only person anywhere in here mentioning bots

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Reread the parent comment and focus on the second half of the first sentence

[–] protist@mander.xyz -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This meme doesn't state or imply anything about bots. You jumped in with "the liberals are blaming bots" from absolutely nowhere my dude

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Did I? The two comments above the one your first comment responded to mentioned Russian bots and neither was written by me

[–] protist@mander.xyz -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Touché, but my point still stands in reference to the chap I was conversing with. And what you said still doesn't make any sense

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Your claim was that that person talked about Russian bots out of nowhere while it was the third comment in a chain that at least mentioned Russian bots.

A: they are all Russian bots
B: not all of them are Russian bots
C: none of us are Russian bots
U: Why is C talking about Russian bots out of nowhere? Where is this coming from? It's not in the meme and I don't understand the concept of comments that refer to other comments while write one myself.

I'm not even defending the tankie triade. I'm defending reading comprehension

[–] protist@mander.xyz 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

A and C are the same user...

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

To clarify, there is no actual lemmy.ru, OP added it in to imply the other instances are Russian ops. The common narrative libs on lemmy use is that they're russian bots.

If you don't believe that's what OP meant, why don't you tell us your interpretation?

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ever thought about the possibility that Russian Bot might be used as an allegory for Russia Sympathizer? This is a meme, you took it too literal. Besides, could you scrutinize your liberal/tankie dichotomy? There are quite some anarchists here on lemmy who oppose both Western and Russian imperialism. Thanks.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You're not opposing western imperialism while supporting their war.

This obviously doesn't apply to people living in Russia, who should oppose their government's actions.

Do you genuinely believe that we are acting in the interests of the Ukrainian people, unlike literally every single military action we've taken since WWII? When we were bombing Syria and arming ISIS and Al Nusra to "liberate" Syria (and stealing their oil and crops), did you think that was for the good of the Syrians? When we bombed Libya to oust that evil dictator Ghaddafi, did you think that was good for the Libyans? When we bombed Yemen to oust the Houthi's, did you think that was in the interests of the Yemeni people? Do you think the Iraqi people are better off today than they would have been if we didn't invade them twice and cause over a million premature deaths, mostly of children simply due to sanctions? I haven't even gotten to the 90s yet. Hell this isn't even exhaustive for the 2000s.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't get how you took my "I oppose western imperialism" to mean that I support western imperialism. I'm not supporting those wars. Where do you even take that from? I went to protests against the Iraq invasion 2 decades ago. Did you?

I get the sentiment that it's more important to oppose one's own government but this should lead to supporting other governments. It's possible to oppose both.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you don't think we should be sending bombs to our puppet Ukraine, your position is identical with HB/.ml/grad, our lack of support for western imperialism is what gets us labeled supporters of Russia. Where exactly is the disagreement?

This is literally no different from getting called a terrorist supporter in 2002.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

Let's just agree to disagree, even tho we can't even agree on what we disagree on

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, in this case I totally misunderstood A and jumped to wrong conclusions. Thanks for correcting me

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

It doesn’t exist yet but it would definitely plot with the triad.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago