this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
833 points (98.3% liked)

DeclineIntoCensorship

464 readers
1 users here now

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I'm not saying this couldn't happen, but this justdoesn't ring super true to me. How would the user know who the "identified individual" was, how they found the husband's information, or who they called (the "friend") at his company that's apparently in control of his employment? That's a lot of convenient coincidences that, even of they are true, would hardly be easily accessible information to make such a confident accusation.

[–] lonerangers1@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

truepeoplesearch.com

give it a go. Try searching your name, number, address and see what you get.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

It doesn't ring true because of the vagueness of the post.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›