this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
1077 points (97.4% liked)

Greentext

5231 readers
1835 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vivendi@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

My city has extreme height changes on almost every road -- you'd have to be a seriously beefy rider to commute with a bike

[–] Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Pedal assist bikes exist, source am heavy ass bike commuter that has to go uphill to work.

[–] Trollception@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Lol same. You can't jog in my neighborhood, well some can. Even walking around is quite difficult going up some streets.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 19 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

car go further faster, and car more useful when not in big city.

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 12 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

For this, bike friendly cities have good public transport (bus/tram/metro) and bike shares

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Anyone who has ridden in rain and adverse weather would know one reason cars are more popular.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Picking up a week's worth of shopping for a family, whilst taking your baby with you, in the pouring rain, and you live up a steep hill, and you have joint pain, and a sudden work meeting across the other side of town in an hour...

I'd love a city designed round bicycles (Cambridge, UK is quite good like that in the centre) but man, despite the downsides cars are amazing things.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Green Mario's most loyal companion

[–] licheas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Princess peach? or are you meaning companion as "friend" rather than "paramour"?

[–] yogaxpto@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not probably, a human riding a bicycle is the most efficient way to convert energy into movement. No other vehicle or animal can be as efficient.

[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago

Thats why I have a bike-sled team to pull my horribly inefficient sled across the asphalt

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Make no problem with bikes in Florida, when you arrive you are so drenched in sweat you are no longer presentable and stink to high heaven.

Biking to work if you have an office job is out of the question.

Biking to my gym or KungFu school.... Perfect.

Just need the right tool for the right job.

[–] Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

In europe most modern offices have showers is this just not a thing around you?

[–] licheas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

offices in cities frequently do. maybe larger complexes in suburbs do, but yeah, it's not universal, and it can frequently be tied in with fees associated with a fitness center, etc.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I'm disabled in a way that means I can't use one, but can use a car, which kinda sucks.

Fortunately bike infrastructure usually helps me in my chair, so I'm all in favor of wider bike adoption.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t know your limitations, but you’d be surprised at the number of ways cycling can be made accessible.

For example, there are handbikes that attach to a wheelchair. As with all assistive tech it depends on your specific situation what is possible.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I've frequently seen a couple of people with recumbent hand bikes on one of the popular trails near me. They're decently fast with the reduced air resistance, but road crossings are a bit of a hassle when you aren't tall enough to be seen by an f450

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 34 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Welcome to the Netherlands. If there's anything that fills me with pride it's our cycling culture. Most people have a car too, but I don't, and I do everything by bike and public transport.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TDCN@feddit.dk 12 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Someone can probably do the math, but i have a hunch that humans are technically not very fuel efficient if you look at calories burned pr the total mass being moved along.

But whatever it is biking is awesome, but being technically correct is even better.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 11 hours ago (10 children)

Humans are actually unusually energy efficient for mammals when walking and even more so when cycling. Here's a little info graphic showing a breakdown.

One thing to keep in mind if you have a dog is they're less energy efficient than humans. While dogs can run faster, a reasonably fit human can easily out distance an equally fit dog when walking or distance running.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 6 points 7 hours ago

Also, I love the units. Using miles on one axis and km on the other.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 4 points 7 hours ago

This is very useful. My four friends and I will have to stop swimming to work, and take the car instead.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You couldn't be more wrong. Bicycle is the most efficient way of moving.

If you account manufacturing energy, then in a short time it is overcome by walking.

[–] TDCN@feddit.dk 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Interesting. It just feels so counterintuitive, but as I wrote, it was just a hunch and apparently many telle me now its not so. Do you have any numbers or sources to back up the claim that I can use for future fun facts sessions to annoy my family?

[–] TheButter_ItSeeps@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago

I feel like 'total mass being moved' is irrelevent if most of that mass is useless (car motor/metal frame/plastic/etc).

Even if a car motor was more efficient per kg, most of the work is wasted on moving the actual car itself, regardless of the passengers & cargo.

Bikes clearly use less energy to displace 'useful mass' than a car, so they are more efficient in that sense.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›