this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
42 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6089 readers
481 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
42
Climate Group Funded by Bill Gates Slashes Staff in Major Retreat (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 21 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NoxAstrum@lemmy.ca 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So glad I switched to Linux.

[–] valgarf@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I am curious: I have read the article and don't believe his decision to be particularly bad and the reasons understandable.

While I agree that no one person should have too much power - Bill Gates at least tries to do some good with the money he accumulated. He is no angel, but there is a stark contrast to other billionaires who only use their money selfishly, try to earn even more, or - in Musk's case - to behave like a cartoon supervillain.

So why is he often viewed so negatively? Am I missing something here?

[–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

Because he was one of the first ultra prominent, cut throat asshole billionare nerds.

Wiki: Embrace, extend extinguish for an example.

Don't get me wrong, his attempts at "philanthropy" and the climate softened my view on him a little.

[–] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 4 points 15 hours ago

Citations needed has three or two episodes that may be interesting to hear, if you don't mind it being in podcast format.