this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025

1224 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

71502 readers

4933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws

1224

OpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair use (arstechnica.com)

submitted 3 months ago by cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

493 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 4) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Oh no anyway.jpg

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Sad to see you leave (not really, tho'), love to watch you go!

Edit: I bet if any AI developing company would stop acting and being so damned shady and would just ASK FOR PERMISSION, they'd receive a huge amount of data from all over. There are a lot of people who would like to see AGI become a real thing, but not if it's being developed by greedy and unscrupulous shitheads. As it stands now, I think the only ones who are actually doing it for the R&D and not as eye-candy to glitz away people's money for aesthetically believable nonsense are a handful of start-up-likes with (not in a condescending way) kids who've yet to have their dreams and idealism trampled.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Alright, I confess! Almost all of my training in computer programming came from copyrighted material. Put the cuffs on me!

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] Horrabin@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago

This sounds like socialism is good for capitalists

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

Good, fuck "AI" fuck copyright, fuck patents, fuck proprietary closed-source software, fuck capitalism, fuck billionaires, and fuck you, Sam, in particular.

[–] momodocho@lemmings.world 6 points 3 months ago

looks good

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 6 points 3 months ago

🤞🤞 🙏

[–] weremacaque@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Good. If I ever published anything, I would absolutely not want it to be pirated by AI so some asshole can plagiarize it later down the line and not even cite their sources.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago

Oh no! How could we ever live without AI?

[–] TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago

My main takeaway is that some contrived notion of "national security" has now become an acceptable justification for business decisions in the US.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 5 points 3 months ago (4 children)

To be fair, they’re not wrong. We need to find a legal comprise that satisfies everyone

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (10 children)

Why? Nothing they've shat out is good for anything anyway.

load more comments (10 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] magnus919@lemmy.brandyapple.com 5 points 3 months ago

I'll take him seriously if & when OpenAI lives up to its name.

load more comments