🦋 Bluesky Social

203 readers

91 users here now

Bluesky is a federated social network built on ATProtocol.

Rules:

Follow lemmee's site-wide rules.
All posts must, in some way, relate to Bluesky or ATProto.
Do not make duplicate posts.
Do not post x.com links.

Useful Links:

News, discussion, and memes are all allowed here.

See also:

!peoplebluesky@lemmy.world - for screenshots of Bluesky posts

founded 1 month ago

MODERATORS

airportline@lemm.ee

Emperor@feddit.uk

emperor@lemm.ee

Introducing Northsky - a non-profit Bluesky alternative (northskysocial.com)

submitted 16 hours ago by airportline@lemm.ee to c/bluesky@lemm.ee

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Phase one is to create a PDS that securely hosts data in Canada, away from political persecution of 2SLGBTQIA+.

Phase two and beyond will include our own AppView and improved moderation tools.

These networks will exist side by side with bluesky and allow interaction per usual. Source

top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] termaxima@jlai.lu 28 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Don’t we already have Mastodon ?

[–] airportline@lemm.ee 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This is for Bluesky users who still want to be on Bluesky, but don't want their data stored under US jurisdiction, or want don't want to rely on Bluesky's moderation.

[–] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

So even though blusky isn’t federated, the protocol still allows for using different domains to interact on the platform? I need to study how it works better.

Edit: stupid autocorrect

[–] airportline@lemm.ee 13 points 14 hours ago

Reminder: there is no such thing as a "Bluesky instance." The way ATProto works is nothing like the way ActivityPub works.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I got one for ya https://mastodon.social/

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Speaking of hosting in Canada, I am surprised years ago why Blackberry having lost the hardware race didn't just provide an encrypted messager that ran on Apple and Android. They could have been 'the' messager app and had all the experience, personal and servers to pull it off. And most people would trust Canadian servers

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

wait was blackberry canadian?

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Yeah. RIM (the company behind BlackBerry, before they just rebranded to "BlackBerry") was Canada's most lucrative company right up until the release of the iPhone. They focused entirely on the enterprise market and didn't think there was as much demand for consumer smartphones. Shame they didn't see the writing on the wall until it was too late to pivot.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I checked the FAQ and there's nothing on "why Bluesky?". A Canadian PDS and some better moderation tools seems a pretty meagre goal when they could be looking at getting their community off Bluesky.

[–] airportline@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago

Bluesky is actually pretty good, but the biggest issue currently is that there's too much power centralized in the hands of Bluesky PBLLC. The less we have to rely on Bluesky PBLLC while still having full functionality, the better.

Also, Northsky is planning on launching it's own AppView, meaning posts that would normally be hidden on Bluesky could still be available from Northsky's client.