742
submitted 7 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Highlights: The White House issued draft rules today that would require federal agencies to evaluate and constantly monitor algorithms used in health care, law enforcement, and housing for potential discrimination or other harmful effects on human rights.

Once in effect, the rules could force changes in US government activity dependent on AI, such as the FBI’s use of face recognition technology, which has been criticized for not taking steps called for by Congress to protect civil liberties. The new rules would require government agencies to assess existing algorithms by August 2024 and stop using any that don’t comply.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 118 points 7 months ago

I mean that broadly seems like a good thing. Execution is important, but on paper this seems like the kind of forward thinking policy we need

[-] pandacoder@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Quite frankly it didn't put enough restrictions on the various "national security" agencies, and so while it may help to stem the tide of irresponsible usage by many of the lesser-impact agencies, it doesn't do the same for the agencies that we know will be the worst offenders (and have been the worst offenders).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KeraKali@lemmy.world 110 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

“If the benefits do not meaningfully outweigh the risks, agencies should not use the AI,” the memo says. But the draft memo carves out an exemption for models that deal with national security and allows agencies to effectively issue themselves waivers if ending use of an AI model “would create an unacceptable impediment to critical agency operations.”

This tells me that nothing is going to change if people can just say their algoriths would make them too inefficient. Great sentiment but this loophole will make it useless.

[-] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 7 months ago

This seems to me like an exception that would realistically only apply to the CIA, NSA, and sometimes the FBI. I doubt the Department of Housing and Urban Development will get a pass. Overall seems like a good change in a good direction.

[-] mememuseum@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago

The CIA and NSA are exactly who we don't want using it though.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Agreed but it’s at least a step forward, setting a precedent for AI in government use. I would love a perfect world where all bills passed are “all or nothing” legislation but realistically this is a good start, and then citizens should demand tighter oversight on national security agencies as the next issue to tackle

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 7 months ago

They're exactly who will carry on using it, even if there weren't any exemptions.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Algorithms that gerrymander voting district boundries might be an early battleground.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Folksy narrator: "Turns out, the U.S. government can not operate without racism."

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Great sentiment but

It's not a "great sentiment" - it's essentially just more of the same liberal "let's pretend we care by doing something completely ineffective" posturing and little else.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

Democrats are so fucking naive. They actually think that a system of permission slips is sufficient to protect us from the singularity.

OpenAI’s original mission, before they forgot it, was the only workable method: distribute the AI far and wide to establish a multipolar ecosystem.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 29 points 7 months ago

Hell fucking yea. Who is this Biden guy?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 23 points 7 months ago

I swear to god there has to be an entire chapter in Gödel Escher Bach about how this is literally impossible.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] endlessmeddler@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

Is it already too late for us? Does anyone truly believe that will be enough to protect us?

[-] thejodie@programming.dev 6 points 7 months ago

Sent to my state representative. Thanks!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
742 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

55545 readers
4025 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS