81
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rascabin@lemmy.ml 77 points 8 months ago

My Firefox and Ublock extension must be living under a rock then because i don't see any ads.

[-] sk8boy204@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago
[-] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 8 months ago

SmartTubeNext on FireTV stick, ReVanced on the phone and Firefox/uBlock origin on the PC. I've only seen the news about this elusive change. At this point I'm curious which ad blockers are not working and what their market share is.

[-] DeGandalf@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago

ublock actually IS affected by this. I've had it multiple times, that I got blocked. However the uBlock team is extremely fast at adding better filters, and each time I had the problem it only took about an hour until it worked again (though I needed to update the filters manually, since that is normally done only once a day)

So if you weren't watching YT right in those one hour intervalls you wouldn't have noticed it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FunkyMonk@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago

I keep seering variations of this post and after the first few I stopped checking youtube to see if my ublock on firefox still does ok.

[-] clearleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I think it's just google chrome where ublock doesn't work. My friend uses ungoogled chromium and he hasn't seen it either.

[-] Teon@kbin.social 48 points 8 months ago

Chromium based browsers, (Chrome, Edge) are blocking ad blockers.
Firefox is NOT.
Also, Chrome is not a browser, it is an advertising tracking piece of software that surveils your every click. In the 'olden' days, this was called spyware. It's a piece of software that exploits it's users. It, like spyware, used to be bundled with all kind of other programs. Does anyone remember the line, "Also install Chrome Browser" when you installed other software?
Have a better life, install Firefox and uBlock Origin.
Also Fuck Brave, they are liars.

[-] einfach_orangensaft@feddit.de 8 points 8 months ago

i will print that comment out and glue it to every bus stop in a 50mile radius

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gladaed@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago

Claiming Chtome to not be a browser is needlessly hyperbolic.

[-] Teon@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] b_van_b@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago
[-] Dontfearthereaper123@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Iirc they are also spyware and I recall something abt the token being built into the browser tho I'm not entirely sure what

[-] philm@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago

I have already wondered, why it's still working for me :). Good to know, then it's finally settled, I will stay on Firefox. I hope it will continue to work with adblockers there... (Google has way to much "stake" in Mozilla)

[-] philm@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago

Btw. do you know the technical reason why it's still working with Firefox? Does it have to do with this new anti-adblock-API that was recently introduced in Chrome and Safari?

[-] Teon@kbin.social 10 points 8 months ago

Yes, that's my understanding. And because Firefox is not chromium based they can't mess with the underlying code. Plus uBlock Origin works better on Firefox and it gets updates faster.

[-] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Then how come I can still access it?
Using µblock on Firefox in Germany

[-] FierroGamer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I imagine it's like most YouTube updates (if not all) that are rolled out partially to different users through different areas.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AlexanderESmith@kbin.social 15 points 8 months ago

At this point - unless there's a very good reason - I just don't interact with YouTube's site or app anymore.

I hope YouTube pulls a Reddit, and federated video services get the same bump. Creators can plug NordVPN, Brilliant, and Wix just as well on PeerTube, and we won't have to watch dumbass political ads anymore.

[-] danielbln@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

You underestimate the cost and complexity of video streaming.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

I don't have experience with any of those, YouTube is still ad free for me luckily, but how plausible would a completely peer hosted video streaming service be? Like TOR based or something like that where it's the collective of all the users hosting.

[-] DarkenLM@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago

Realistically? Virtually impossible. Youtube handles petabytes of data daily, and just the storage capacity would burn the money of everyone but the big corporations. There simply isn't a way to compete with a corporation that can afford to throw millions at a machine that doesn't make profit enough to cover those massive costs.

[-] jadero@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago

You're considering only the prospect of doing things the YouTube way, as a service owned and operated by a single entity. As my dad was known to say "there is more than one way to skin a cat." Who knows whether that is literally true, but the metaphor has proven accurate every time someone finds a different, often better, way to do something.

[-] AlexanderESmith@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

It's not just plausible, it already exists. See joinpeertube.org . There are more than 1000 instances already. Just need more content creators (some are already dual-posting, or migrated entirely).

There's also LBRY, but it operates on some goofy-ass crypto scheme, so I assume it will fail.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Dope, I'll check it out, although it might be slow growth right now, YouTube for a lot of people like me is hard to break. I've got years and years of saved videos, subscriptions, watch history, etc.

[-] AlexanderESmith@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

True, but you are here, instead of reddit. It's possible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Risus_Nex@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] quekk@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago

I recommend https://grayjay.app/ you can follow creators cross platform and watch yt without ads

[-] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I would totally give them some money for it if I watched more yt on my phone, but I rarely ever do that. They desperately need a desktop version.

[-] WillardHerman@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Just don’t use youtub.

[-] detectivesniffles@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago

you use youtube with adblock because it is a great repository of information without having to deal with ads

i use youtube with adblock because it costs google money

we are not the same

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
81 points (89.3% liked)

Android

649 readers
1 users here now

Android news for android developers. Everything that happens in android world.

For Android development specific topics please see /c/android_dev

The Android robot is reproduced or modified from work created and shared by Google and used according to terms described in the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS