this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
808 points (98.7% liked)

Political Memes

7843 readers
3782 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] seeigel@feddit.org 14 points 6 days ago

That's the utility of unemployment, to force people into factories. Coming soon.

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 6 days ago

I really like this chart because it highlights how, despite all the awful shit that happens every day, we are more alike than we are different. It's gonna take a lot to undo the propaganda, hatred, etc., but if we focus on Class instead of other ways of being divided and conquered, the change everyone wants can eventually happen.

[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

Eh, I don't want more people working in manufacturing. I want more people enjoying their lives and maybe robots doing that sort of job. Ew, me and my progressive thoughts.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

No no, you have this wrong. We want factories, but it should be all robots and the people that don't own factories should simply kill themselves.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 134 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm guessing the people commenting don't work in a factory.

It's Taco Bell wages with lung cancer air and no air conditioning. It's not better for anyone. I work in one that makes a "world famous" product rich people absolutely love. They still look to hire people at $17/hr in a VHCOL area....

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 105 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yup. The rose coloured glasses folks think manufacturing jobs provided good pay, when it was union jobs that did that. And you can turn any industry into a unionized industry with enough ~~fire~~ effort.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And you can turn any industry into a unionized industry with enough ~~fire~~ effort.

This is fucking poetry. It's a shame I'll forget it in 5 minutes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Fucking real. Capatalism needs these job, not humans.

[–] FriendlyBeagleDog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I do understand the allure of "we should make things again", and the security implications of maintaining a local manufacturing capacity and workforce - but I think people from advanced economies are incredibly myopic about what it actually looks like to develop that capacity back.

It'll be difficult for the US to compete on price with countries like China, which have a much better developed manufacturing sector and lower wages / cost of living, even with steep tariffs applied to inflate the prices of imported goods.

They'd probably have to subsidise production in the short-term, and invest heavily in capital to automate production to the greatest extent possible so as to avoid needing to ask Americans to accept lower living standards to stand a chance.

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

Another thing to consider with manufacturing is logistics, there are so many things that have to come together to manufacture a single doohicky.

Buying land near a transit hub is expensive so you try to buy land in a rural area, but then how do you get it shipped to you while maintaining reasonable prices so you can stay competitive? Ground transit is fine as long as petrol prices are low, but most manufacturing is putting together other goods, which largely come from other countries.

So you.. start a mine to get whatever you need? Just grab a pickaxe and start digging I guess, otherwise it doesn't matter what you make the prices will be 10x china's because the costs are outrageous.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 37 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I mean, that's not necessarily bad, right? 80% people think that it would be better for them if someone worked in a factory and 25% think it would be better if they personally worked in a factory. So, if the 25% get a chance to work in a factory, they're satisfied and the 80% is satisfied as well.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Assuming the 80% could be satisfied...is a big assumption.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You could also think that the country would be better off with people working manufacturing instead of gig jobs like Uber or minimum wage at restaurants since manufacturing in the US typically meant unions and better pay.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not in modern day USA. I mean there are people working to re-legalise child labour.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think you would need far more than 25% to get to where the average “why don’t we make things anymore” dork dreams about

Like 25% of the Chinese workforce is in manufacturing (roughly) but they’ve got the infrastructure and have put decades into systems to build what they have.

America would be building it from the ground up. Automation systems take time to iron out kinks and cost a lot up front.

And all this to find out that American made is just a meaningless phrase because it’s not about where an item is physically made, it’s about standards to which the items construction is dictated. China can make things of extremely high quality. They’re just consistently tasked to make things by cutting as many corners as possible to maximize profits at the expense of consumers. Those same shitty practices applied to American manufacturing will result in “made in America” shit. Case in point you can find plenty of stuff currently manufactured in America that is total shit. You can find stuff manufactured in America that is high quality and you can find stuff manufactured in China that is high quality. The country of manufacture is meaningless and this pissing match is pointless

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I think you would need far more than 25% to get to where the average “why don’t we make things anymore” dork dreams about

American manufacturing has been on a consistently upward trajectory and has never been higher. Many things made in America either are highly skilled, highly automated, or both. The hubbub about "bringing manufacturing back" is all just a smokescreen to redirect the anger from Americans who used to have stable, well paying, union factory jobs, who never will have one again.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My partner would 100% be happier working in a factory than in fast food. Right now he's in the hospital kitchen which is the next best thing.

I think America would be better if nursing assistant was a job people could just do for the rest of their career instead of calling it a "student job" so they can justify paying peanuts. Hell they're doing that with nurses now too, everybody's going to NP or CRNA school; then who the hell is gonna flip granny? You gotta flip that bird 6 times a shift like a lil pancake just so she doesn't wear a hole in her saggy lil tush! Depressed wages are pushing everybody outta direct care so they can eat, and then there's nobody left to actually provide direct care! And telework jobs like case management and utilization review which wouldn't even exist if insurance companies no longer existed, which would be a deep heresy against capitalism. Granny can probably still call the doctor and a cab for herself but who the hell gonna load her actual body into the car? Even when medicaid covers the bill uber ain't gonna let their drivers take liability for anything more than putting her bag in the back seat for her.

Revalue direct-care Healthcare workers 2025!

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 32 points 1 week ago

People have been brainwashed to hate unions, so they equate the good jobs that can support families with factories instead. There's nothing special about a factory job, except that a factory is difficult to close down when workers unionize.

What we need is high unionization, including sector wide unions.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago

I'd be better off if I worked in a factory but they paid me $250k. Balls in your court, factory owner.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Subtext: Americans would be fine with minorities working in factories.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Why the hell would you change the word to manufacturing vs. factory?

Is there more to this survey? Is someone just cherry picking these two questions?

I think it's obvious people have a much more negative association with "factory job" than "a job in manufacturing". A factory job very much brings the ideas of assembly lines into people's mind. A job in manufacturing could bring that, but it could also bring ideas of engineers, designers, etc.

This is either a garbage survey specifically wording one question differently to get the outcome they wanted; or someone picked two questions that should not be directly compared like this without context.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Even the fundamentals of the questions are different. Its not Americans would be better off, but America. Which is a question asking if the nation would be better off, not the individuals living in it. Where as the next question is from the perspective of an individual living in the country.

As an aside, I've worked in factories, they do indeed suck to work at and I will never again go near that work. Mostly because of the types of people. Asshole bosses and reactionary dipshit co-workers. Office work is boring and a little soul sucking but at least the people are chill and generally progressive at office jobs.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm specifically talking about the wording of the survey questions. If you've ever worked on making survey's and collected good samples for it you quickly learn how much the questions you ask and the way you ask them impacts the results.

An obvious example being surveys asking Americans about "The affordable care act" vs. "Obama Care". You can swing the results by double digit percentages just by changing the name of the same policy.

But taking the results side by side in a vacuum from this so you can get clicks is all financial times cares about.

The article is written so you think "Americans want others to work in factories but not themselves" but if you think about even the numbers with these poorly worded questions for more than a second they actually make sense.

1 in 6 people you survey are gonna be over 65 and retired (assuming you had a representative sample). And even more are gonna be "old"

More are gonna be college educated and already working in a comfortable job.

Obviously many people are going to answer "well, no it's not for me obviously"

It's actually still a large percentage that want to work in a factory considering everything. Which is the opposite of what the article is trying to imply.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

It’s actually still a large percentage that want to work in a factory considering everything. Which is the opposite of what the article is trying to imply.

I mean, if you question the survey so fundamentally then you shouldn't take much of anything from it. Including the opposite conclusion.

For instance, you also have to consider the opposite group: the number of people who are unemployed and people who aren't even participants in the economy but would prefer to be due to financial hardship. Desperate people might accept even awful work as an improvement, even if they'd prefer a completely different job overall if it was available.

And obviously, a lot of the people who perceive factory work as an improvement to their working lives even when already employed are probably thinking about it by mentally associating with the benefits of steady unionized work.

Where I live, basically none of the factory jobs that exist are unionized and are nearly all contract based through 3rd parties.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You and another person didn't fall for FT's propaganda.

Here's the survey.

44 people ITT got trolled.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

This is what always gets me as someone who works in manufacturing. We go though people like clockwork. Finding someone who wants the job, can do the job, and can learn the process is such a monumental task. The sad part is the money is there. You'll get paid better then people with degrees. Still they don't want to do what it takes.

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I worked at a place that had consistent mandatory overtime. I never saw the outside of the factory except to just sleep and then go back again. There was no upward advancement whatsoever. And it was completely unsafe where people would eventually snap and sometimes have to be dragged out by the private police that they hired. Also, when you enter the place, you go through turn styles. Almost as if you're in prison or something. The people that normally want to bring manufacturing back to America are the people that have like a 1950s view of the world. But working in a factory in modern America, it's not really appealing because of how you're treated and you actually get a really low pay. You have no protection under the law. Especially if you're living in a right to work state. And everyone around you is toxic. Thinking that one day their ship will come in, they just need to step on your neck. And I didn't puss out and I saw people come and go and I even worked my way up to different positions. I didn't want to be like the guy getting dragged out and my health was declining so I quit that shitty job and I'll never do it again.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That has not been my experiencing for most manufacturing, including a lot of skilled manufacturing. Every manufacturing job I've done has either paid complete garbage, or has been so mind-numbingly simple and boring that it could be done by trained pigeons.

Give me a solid union manufacturing job, where I'm earning enough on a single income to own a small house and raise a family, and I'd absolutely go back to manufacturing.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

That's exactly where I work today but I'm telling you you wouldnt make it past temp.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Mind-numbing boredom, I'm guessing?

You're probably right; I've got pretty severe ADHD, so staying on task with boring shit is HARD.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eh, our techs don't make shit imo. We are in a high cost of living area, and they make better wages than unskilled labor, but it's nothing like it was back when I was a kid. If you talk to the old heads, what they were making 25 years ago is less than techs make today, not even accounting for inflation. The thing is, the reason we had well paid techs then was strong union membership. If they bring jobs back, the Republicans for sure aren't going to make it a union job, and if they do bring back manufacturing, it'll be in a bunch of shitty "right to work" states, and people will make shit wages. The people in said states are too dumb to unionize, and will keep voting for their oppressors

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As someone who started right out of school, it took years for my income to start to surpass some of the more experienced operators. No its not hundreds of thousands but it's in that 70,000 to 90,000 range for people who don't sleep on OT.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but you shouldn't have to work OT in order to make a livable wage. People should have a work/life balance where they aren't going home from work and immediately falling asleep.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's there, honestly, I'd work OT while being a salaried employee. But your attitude towards it is the exact reason people don't want these manufacturing jobs. So you're only proving my point.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Where I am, 70-90 k is an absolute shit salary is my point. It might be great where you are, but where I am, that's not buying you a house. That's about what our more senior technicians make, but the entry level guys make like $25-28/hr. Almost every office job at our company pays more. I love turning bolts, but it's objectively harder work for less money, and that is why I don't want those jobs.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Where do you live? Not exact location but rural or major Metropolitan area? It matters a lot.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm surrounded by tech companies and a crack house costs $1.4 mil

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Right. These are manufacturing jobs in rural to small cities. Top end of jobs for unskilled workers.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

But your attitude towards it is the exact reason people don’t want these manufacturing jobs

The very idea that that should be a necessary part of a manufacturing job, or any job, is, IMO, "problematic". Too many people have bought into the idea that we should pursue capitalist ideals to the detriment of everything else. I'm not advocating for a socialist utopia (okay, I am, kind of), but you should be able to go to your job, put in eight hours, and go home. If you're constantly doing OT, then the workplace should hire more people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Capital wants us all to serve until death. Don't fall for their factory bullshit. We shouldn't waste our lives burning down the planet for their "profits". We need degrowth, leisure. etc. to save the planet and ourselves.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Something, something Rawls' Veil of Ignorance something.

[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Only about 10% of the working population in the US is in manufacturing, so 20% more people that would want to work in manufacturing is quite a lot. It's impossible to undo the automation that has happened to date, though. Worse, if more people work in manufacturing, the pressure on wages and the pressure to automate can both increase.

Even if we stop all imports and make every finished good purchased in the US here, it's far from enough to bring us back to the historic levels of employment in manufacturing.

[–] Iceman@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

20% is a lot. Goes to show that the working conditions in the US are bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›