55
[Old 1997 story] The Greatest OS That (N)ever Was (www.wired.com)
submitted 8 months ago by s38b35M5@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

How does this coverage hold up? It was a fun read from back in my highschool days, when I was still five years from trying Linux on my own AMD Thunderbird 1Ghz. It wasn't until 2008 that I tried again and it stuck.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Edit: my below comment was actually wrong. They actually do use git.

Thanks for sharing. What I find most interesting is that Linus is still using the same email-based software development methods for the kernel while the rest of the software engineering world has evolved to use his other invention, git, for that. I’m kind of second-hand embarrassed for those geniuses who have yet to adopt proper version control for (what I’d argue is) the most important project in the computing world.

Here’s a far more nuanced explanation from Spore’s reply to this comment :

Git and Email are not mutually exclusive. In order to collaborate with git, you need and only need a way to send your commits to others. Commits can be formatted as plain-text files and sent through emails. That is how git has been used by its author from literally the first release of it.

[-] Spore@lemmy.ml 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Honestly I'm surprised that so many people don't know how git can be used without those repository hosting sites. That's one way to use it, not the only way. And it's not even the way it was originally designed for.

Checkout git format-patch.

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 10 points 8 months ago

I, for one, was quite ignorant of that fact.

[-] otl@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 8 months ago

I'm not so surprised anymore. I'm self-taught using open-source software projects for guidance. But not everyone learns like that. For example in the commercial software dev world, having patches easy to apply with minimum tooling isn't usually a priority (for better or worse).

This is actually a little story I had half written down; your comment prompted me to finish it. Thanks! https://www.srcbeat.com/2023/11/git-email/

[-] ourob@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 8 months ago

What? Linux does use git for version control.

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 6 points 8 months ago

Is this article (and the many sources I see confirming it) inaccurate then?

https://www.theregister.com/AMP/2020/08/25/linux_kernel_email/

I’m happy to be wrong if you have any evidence to refute what I’ve written.

Ps. I’m talking about the kernel.

[-] Spore@lemmy.ml 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Git and Email are not mutually exclusive. In order to collaborate with git, you need and only need a way to send your commits to others. Commits can be formatted as plain-text files and sent through emails. That is how git has been used by its author from literally the first release of it.

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 11 points 8 months ago

Thanks for the insight. I’ll edit my comment to point to yours.

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Could you explain? I'm still stuck with a mind-block, can't imagine how a git server can track changes to code with messages from email

[-] Spore@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

A git server don't need to know email to work, and it is not required to have a git server. Email in this workflow is an alternative to a PR: contributor submit a set of commits to the maintainer (or anyone interested). Then the maintainer is free to apply or merge the commits. After that the code can be pushed to any servers.

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Ah, you mean email being used as a direct alternative to issue reports? I get it now, and TBH this makes intuitive sense. Thanks

[-] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah, that's not quite right. You need a means to discuss things and review code. You can do this via a website or mailing list. The Linux kernel uses the latter. Lots of other devs use the former. Like Github. And Github and Git aren't the same. The issue tracking, discussion platform etc are something Github does on top of Git. You can as well use Email or a different service/online platform for the communication. The actual program code is stored in Git in both cases.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 12 points 8 months ago

I honestly thought this was going to be about os2

[-] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 8 months ago

I was expecting Copland (what would have been Mac OS 8, had the project survived).

[-] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

Gosh my dad ran that in the early 90s. Was that Linux? He was then and still is a Microsoft person.

[-] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think it was an IBM/MS OS. Forget if it was desktop, server or "other" though.

Edit: that's right, it was IBM hoping to privatize the OS on a hard-to-clone PC (PS/2) when they saw their market share eroding quickly. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/11/half-an-operating-system-the-triumph-and-tragedy-of-os2/

[-] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago

Wow, big memory trip! It was os/2 warp, I saw that package and knew it!

Dad worked for IBM in the 70s, no surprise. I also remember him having an OS box with a penguin on it but I don't believe he ever installed it. ~95ish.

[-] astraeus@programming.dev 8 points 8 months ago

You’ve read your last complementary article this month. The second Library of Alexandria doesn’t burn down, it gets locked behind a paywall.

[-] pan_troglodytes@programming.dev 8 points 8 months ago

Whatever the actual numbers, it is not unrealistic that Linux will emerge as the second operating system after Windows, especially given Apple's currently confusing sense of direction.

curious for a 27 year old article how accurate it turned to be (androidOS notwithstanding). Windows seems to still be the "2,000-pound gorilla" but there are other options available these days...

[-] astraeus@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago

Windows has lost a ton of market share, unfortunately it gave much of that market share to MacOS

[-] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago

This is funny because 2008 is also when I got stuck on it. Interesting read, thanks for sharing!

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
55 points (98.2% liked)

Linux

45615 readers
914 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz