this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
589 points (96.7% liked)

Memes

8261 readers
313 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 133 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] MxM111@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago

Less known 301.4375C at which F and K are the same and equal to 574.5875

[–] 0x4E4F@infosec.pub 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, they kinda relate 🥶.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (12 children)

that's when it starts to get 'cold'. before that, it's just a 'little chilly'.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Found the Scandinavian?

[–] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know this is a joke but as a Minnesotan I think right around -15°F (-26°c) is where it starts to get 'cold'. This is where the air really begins to sting your face and people have issues starting their vehicles.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

am a native and lived there most my life. only had problems with my piece-of-shit cars when it got colder than -20F or so. block heater (on a timer) and a newish-battery and they always started, though, even during that record cold snap (-60F).

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

You mean..

-40°C = (-40-32)/18*10

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Kelvin and Celsius are literally the same just offset by 273.15°

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 76 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally the same just different.

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Kelvin was developed from Celsius. The only difference is that 0° is based on absolute 0 (because it's logical and constant) rather than the rough freezing point of water (a vague and inconsistent reference point). Every degree change in one unit is exactly the same change in the other.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the meme is exactly about not having the same 0 point

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago

Except Kelvin aren't degrees (e.g. it's just 273'15K not 273'15°K). But a change of one Kelvin is indeed equivalent to a change of one degree Celsius.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

F and C are laterally the same just offset by 32 and scaled by 5/9.

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ehh, they were developed in different ways using completely different reference points

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

C and K use different reference points too, yet you called them laterally the same.

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have a lot more in common than Celsius and Fahrenheit, which are only related because they are both measures of temperature.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

That depends how you count “a lot more in common”. The reference points for zero is much closer for C and F. People commonly use in everyday life C and F, but not K. Should I continue?

[–] SamirCasino@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Ah yes just rolls off the tongue. Totally the same as, an increment of one is equal in both.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Theyre also not pointing guns at each other in the picture.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same relationship between Rankine and Fahrenheit.

And 0 Kelvin and 0° Rankine are three same temperature.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In that case I assume it would be 0 Rankine without degrees, too? Because it's an absolute unit like Kelvin.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's still technically defined based on its relationship to Fahrenheit, just like Kelvin was with Celsius until the 60s.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Kelvin and Rankine are based.

What’s Ra°? Not Reamur (Re°) or Rømer (Rø°)

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

I think Ra° is an alternate for Rankine

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Rankine is based? The same way pound-mol and 1000th of an inch are based?

AT THAT POINT, WHY NOT JUST USE METRIC o_0

I bite my thumb at Rankine, sir.

[–] yamapikariya@lemmyfi.com 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because 0 is not a lack of temperature like the measurements. (With the exception of Kelvin)

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And Rankin, which is apparently just the Kelvin for Fahrenheit.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago
[–] MxM111@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Add eV there too.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds funny but really, why would a weight or length measurement start with ≠0?? Like "size of the dick or prince Charles"?

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But that argument would go for temperature as well. Yet, here we are with the most commonly used ones having zero as wey more than the "nothing"-level.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

Zero comes from experience, at least in Celsius. Its semi-scientifical as water is a pretty big part of our world. For our life and all it is pretty much the turning point, isnt it? But of course it could also be 50 or so, as below is possible

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

0lbs ≠ 0kg in the absence of gravity.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait what? Even if you're measuring mass both times?

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You're right, "pounds" is ambiguous.

[–] quickhatch@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kilograms are mass, but pounds are weight. Therefore 0 kg = 0 slug, or 0 N = 0 lbs

[–] Liquid_Fire@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I thought pounds could be used for either mass or force, and in modern usage just saying "pounds" usually refers to mass. Wikipedia seems to agree:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_(mass)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_(force)

[–] quickhatch@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Sorry, perhaps this is a disciplinary difference. In engineering, physics, and biomechanics (my doctoral specialization), and from a unit standard perspective, the pound representing both mass and weight is a false equivalency born out of convenience. This is why the Imperial standard for mass is the slug, allowing for gravitational acceleration of a mass to equate to a force.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah this is exactly why I was confused. Pounds can definitely be used to measure mass. So the guy was wrong and assuming stupid parameters

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

If only they made a meter equal a yard. I'm okay with a bigger yard. Let's do it.

load more comments
view more: next ›