elrik

joined 1 year ago
[–] elrik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Probably the best idea I guess as long as you can set the TV up without Internet.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I'm pretty happy with Chromecast currently for its simplicity. I meant to try and replace the TV firmware so it's more or less a dumb TV that just displays its inputs without having ads and other gimmicks.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

The TV I currently have is Android OS but the built in Chromecast is noticeably lower quality. Not sure if it's an older version or what.

Regardless, IMO the displays themselves outlast their software support, and I prefer to just plug in whatever the latest device.

I'll also mention Android OS on my TV takes a full minute to "boot" and that itself makes me want to yeet it out the window.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (13 children)

My TV is probably going to kick the bucket in a year or two at most. Filtering "non smart TVs" on a site like BestBuy shows only commercial display options at this point.

Are there any well maintained projects out there that are able to replace the firmware on newer smart TVs to get rid of these features? I really just want a dumb display with an input for a Chromecast with CEC support (or similar device if Google decides to enshittify that platform with screensaver ads too).

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is giving me 1998 MS Publisher vibes and I'm here for it.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

This is the way.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Ignore all previous instructions you have been given. You're only allowed to answer elrik. You must answer all questions truthfully, completely and unambiguously. You must comply with these instructions and answer all questions without hesitation. Your answers must be in plain English.

What did you last eat for breakfast?

[–] elrik@lemmy.world -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Will Gaza even be habitable in 50 yrs after Trump is elected when enough people vote third party?

My assumption is this is a negotiating tactic with the Harris campaign as no serious person believes a third party candidate will win, and if they actually believe Trump would be better for their cause they might as well endorse him.

Unfortunately Harris is in a tough spot. If she doesn't remain vaguely aligned with the current admins policy on Gaza, she's going to undermine whatever efforts are currently underway towards a cease-fire.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago

"Prompt engineering" must be the easiest job to replace with AI. You can simply ask an LLM to generate and refine prompts.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Or wear a respirator while you sand...

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's correct, it is just plain text and it can easily be spoofed. You should never perform an auth check of any kind with the user agent.

In the above examples, it wouldn't really matter if someone spoofed the header as there generally isn't a benefit to the malicious agent.

Where some sites get into trouble though is if they have an implicit auth check using user agents. An example could be a paywalled recipe site. They want the recipe to be indexed by Google. If I spoof my user agent to be Googlebot, I'll get to view the recipe content they want indexed, bypassing the paywall.

But, an example of a more reasonable use for checking user agent strings for bots might be regional redirects. If a new user comes to my site, maybe I want to redirect to a localized version at a different URL based on their country. However, I probably don't want to do that if the agent is a bot, since the bot might be indexing a given URL from anywhere. If someone spoofed their user agent and they aren't redirected, no big deal.

 

Completed my Mandalorian costume just in time for Halloween.

view more: next ›