this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Europeans

1 readers
1 users here now

Actual Europe. Open debate about european and international matters.

Europe news and opinion from European countries. Scope is limited to geographical Europe including all EU countries but no further.

Rules:

Act honorably. Here is some good guidelines

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

ban forced marriages, female genital mutilation

Why only female? Why the double standard?

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because the case of forced female marriage is much more of an issue than that for males? It is much more efficient to spend energy fighting a widespread injustice than a very uncommon one that may be more situational than traditional

[–] hikaru755@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think they're talking about the genial mutilation part, not the marriage part

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

ah yeah, makes sense

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

In France, rape is defined as a sexual act committed under threat, duress, surprise or violence.

Well... yeah? Seems perfectly logical to me. Those can be proven in a court, how do you prove that you did not consent in cases that are not listed above?

Edit: The legifrance article about rape, which the official, state provided explanations and listing of French law, states the above definition, followed by an important addition:

Rape occurs when an act of sexual penetration or an oral-genital act is committed on a person, with violence, coercion, threat or surprise, that is without his consent.

I'm pretty sure the opposition to a redefinition of "rape" is due to provability of the crime, and not a denial of the importance of consent

Edit2: source