this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
190 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

58115 readers
3922 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago
[–] rImITywR@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Does this mean Linux phones might finally be on the horizon? I know Pine64 has existed for a couple of years, but the software is still not in a useable state.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hardware support in terms of CPUs/SoCs was never the issue. Ubuntu touch ran perfectly on my Nexus 4 in 2014 or so.

But the software is just not there. There's no app store to speak of and you can hardly buy anything running not Android or iOS off the shelf.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like this would be a lot more viable today than it was when Ubuntu and Firefox tried it. Progressive Web Apps have come a long way, both in terms of quantity and quality. Newer desktop Linux apps have more flexible designs as well, so they could probably be adapted more easily than back then.

Might just make more sense to fork AOSP though.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The relevant apps are YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, etc. And they don't have PWAs as far as I know.

I'd argue it's even today, simply because apps (and not web pages) are so entrenched. And without apps, a phone is almost useless.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They all have functional mobile sites though, and those can be wrapped into an app-like experience on the client side easily enough.

I basically did that with Facebook back when I still used it. The official app was so outrageously shitty, so I used third-party apps that wrapped the mobile site.

It wouldn't be great but it'd be good enough for early adopters (mostly technical users). Enough to make a viable niche perhaps, and grow from there.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

That was possible years ago.

Did it work?

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

Android is a Linux phone. Hardware is not the issue.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

How would this change anything Linux Phones? Debian has had support for ARM CPUs for quite awhile, which is what nearly all of today's smartphones run. So how does RISC-V support change anything now?

[–] simple@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

In the long run, yeah. I wouldn't say they're on the horizon, even when major distros do support RISC-V there will still be serious issues and I doubt most programs will work. I'd wager about 4 years until risc-v is usable for average use.