this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
779 points (98.7% liked)

World News

36884 readers
920 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is this actually that Spotify doesn't want to have to qualify value? Remuneration equal across regions? Oof being equitable could get expensive!

[–] Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is this actually that Spotify doesn't want to have to qualify value?

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

They'd rather pay 200 mil to people like Joe Rogan. It doesn't matter how you look at that deal, he's not worth that much, and there would be 0% chance of getting that money back (thats a lot of additional subscriptions)

[–] sQuirrel21@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Free market.... always look for more ethical options that still fit your music. An ideal platform would be Audius. It's built on blockchain technology but is limited with music content. It would be the perfect way to allow artists to make a living and get rid of the record label kingpins and Spotify pimps forever!

[–] nothingcorporate -1 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Fuck Spotify. If you don't want to be a 40 year old and buy albums, Deezer and Tidal pay much larger royalties than Spotify.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›