this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
933 points (94.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43950 readers
1130 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

like I went to taco bell and they didn't even have napkins out. they had the other stuff just no napkins, I assume because some fucking ghoul noticed people liked taking them for their cars so now we just don't get napkins! so they can save $100 per quarter rather than provide the barest minimum quality of life features.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Fiduciary responsibility, number has to get bigger

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think it's less that we're expected to sympathize, and more just that they've realized enough people will tolerate it. With OP's example, Taco Bell has clearly decided that whatever business they may lose due to people deciding to not go to Taco Bell anymore because of the lack of napkins will be less than whatever they save by not stocking napkins anymore.

And they're right.

Don't get me wrong, it's a shitty thing to do, but between people in general not realizing that this place doesn't even have napkins anymore, and people deciding they still want semi-delicious garbage tacos anyway, they're really not going to see a big dip in revenue. They've simply realized that they really can just make their presented experience a little shittier just to save some money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zibitee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If you've never operated or owned a restaurant before, it's because the top 3 expenses in a restaurant are: food, labor, and paper. Controlling paper usage helps control costs significantly. That's why.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you sure they didn't just conscript the napkins for TP? It is Taco Bell after all...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Its hard to believe a fucking nobody bank like SVB collapsing could do this.

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

It’s all disgusting out there.

My wife and I kicked all fast food 2010.

We use a crock pot for beans. Buy tortillas etc. We can beat Taco Bell burritos with zero worry about disease.

We transmuted our disgust for corporate hegemony into carefully crafted campaign designed to rise above it as much as possible.

And we’re not saints. Still using abuser Amazon because fuck. But we try and I ride right in by fast food faces feeling so good not to give them an effing dime.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

Stop your consumerism, vote with your wallet

It's a pretty complicated economics question why inflation is happening. They're working on it by adjusting interest rates, I guess.

As for why the average American isn't doing so well, it's basically the rich getting richer while the poor get poorer. If this same inflation was happening with a 70's distribution of wealth (and IIRC it actually did) it wouldn't be fun but it wouldn't be pushing so many people to the brink, either.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Taco Bell will just put out a "napkin tipping" jar and blame lack of tips for not providing napkins.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί