Tailscale and a cheap VPS running the exit node tends to be a common route.
Lets you expose services out without opening anything localy and gets you full control out from the VPS without ISP meddeling.
There are other alternatives but tailscale has the best free tier with upto 100 devices, exit node+router, solid access control and mfa.
hmmm i see.. i've head bout tailscale.. but how's the speed? will all traffic from home have to go thru the VPS (slowing down connection, and consuming costly VPS bandwidth)?
Tailscale negotiates a direct VPN to the VPS and all traffic going through the VPN goes through the VPS.
As for bandwidth its not really that expensive unless you need like 30-50tb per month type numbers.
If its specific machines you can install tailscale on those also and they make a direct connection.
I got on my phone,laptop,tablet etc so wherever i am it will use tailscale as middleman to find open ports and establish a vpn to home network.
You can get a a VPS with unlimited bandwidth, I use IONOS at work, it’s a 500mb connection on their end (1gig at work) we have multiple people streaming video/downloading files without issue.
wow, ok, tnx for the leads.
Instead of the "cheap VPS" part, you might find you can use one of the free instances you can get in Oracle Cloud's free offering.
...and WireGuard it together. I also did this before I got static IPs...
Well, I used it as a VPN to go home, but the principle is the same.
What about using DDNS vs an IP?
hi there,
i'm unable to do that. I really need a static IP, also needed to maintain sessions, IP whitelists, and such.
There are VPNS that offer public IPs, some more enterprise grade VPNs can offer static IPs as well. But its not cheap.
Another way if traffic is mostly HTTP(S) based you can use cloudflare, seems to be the norm here.
Why are you moving to an ISP that does not support your needs? are you moving?
The current ISP's service have been terrible.... frequent down times, that usually take 5-24 hours to resolve. It's unbearable. We were thinking of getting starlink too.
Yes all traffic i need to forward are http based... so that cloudflare thing, did u mean the cloudflared tunnel thing they have? if so, i think I will need to create different tunnels for each port I want to open right?
the other issue that I have is i need a fixed IP in order to access remote databases we use in development. It's a security thing (our remote database server whitelists connecting IP)
I knew when you described being behind CGNAT that you were talking about Starlink. Starlink isn't necessarily a solution to your problems. I have it, and it's recently been pretty slow where I am, and their support is famously difficult to work with. If you have a terrestrial option, it's probably worth taking a good look at whether you really want Starlink. A few hours of reading in r/starlink may be able to help.
For your other issue, it seems like the best answer is for your employer to provide a VPN (a real VPN, hosted by the employer, not some janky BorgVPN thing whose only purpose is paying YouTubers to lie about what people use their service for.) That has the additional advantage of greatly simplifying the whitelist, which is good for security.
hi
thanks for the insights
unfortunately employer wont be setting up VPNs anytime soon :(
Cloudflare works well
And are you talking bout their service called Cloudflared? Because if so, will I need to create a cloudflare tunnel for each port i want to open?
No, you should be able to create one tunnel and pass all your traffic through it I haven't played with ports tho, only sub domains (i have a reverse proxy behind it)
Yeah this is his I do public facing stuff.
well that's cool. But I do have to install cloudflared onto each of my server/machines right? And what about machines i need to connect to that doesn't have a regular OS (like a smart vacuum cleaner's GUI)?
Free Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel.
Free Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel
I've never heard of this one but tnx for the lead!
You might not even need it, depending on where you are in the world. Starlink assigns IPv6 addresses differently than they assign IPv4 addresses, so you could potentially use dynamic DNS as long as you stick to IPv6 for all of your services. Still a violation of the Starlink TOS, of course, but who hasn't engaged in a little light TOS violation from time to time?
haha yehbut i did try starlink before, and incoming traffic isn't getting thru. I will try again if necessary. Right now I want to use local ISP as it is cheaper, faster, more stable than starlink
The easiest would be to use Cloudflare Tunnels. It is also free.
All the 5,000,000,000 posts about this wasnt enough?
What do you mean the addresses are private? Are you double NAT-ed?
As others have mentioned, tailscale or Cloudflare tunnels can solve your problem
The IP address they issued me isn't accessible publicly, and port-forwarding isn't possible.
I'll look into these altertnatives, thanks
Total Views40%Upvote Rate-25Community Karma2Total Shares
haven't heard of L2TP service, but thanks, ill look it up