702
submitted 7 months ago by DannyMac@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] J4g2F@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago

Everytime I hear something about Plex I become a bit happier with my choice for Emby as media server.

At the time of building my then server I could choice between them(jellyfin wasn't a thing yet). Luckily I picked emby

[-] finestnothing@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

I picked Plex mainly because the lifetime sub wasn't bad, and the features and polished interface were worth it. If Plex adds too many garbage/bloat features or removes useful features then I'll jump ship to jellyfin immediately. Same boat for paying for bitwarden vs self hosting vaultwarden

[-] Thann@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

This is the problem with proprietary software, it starts out fine, but as it get more popular the value goes down

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Stephen304@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago

Stuff like this really makes me want to switch to jellyfin, but I watch stuff from me and my friend groups libraries and Plex lets me search for shows across my entire friend group at once. I'm afraid I'll be waiting forever for jellyfin to allow federating servers so that bob@red.instance can share a library with alice@blue.instance allowing Alice to browse red+blue instance content from their home instance UI instead of requiring an account with every instance.

[-] Altomes@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

What sucks to me is how hard jellyfin is to setup outside the network

[-] atomWood@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago

Jellyfin is generally just as easy to set up for external access. The only thing you really need to worry about is having a dynamic IP. If you have a domain name, then setting up dynamic DNS is quite straightforward.

The only issue I have with people remotely accessing Jellyfin is that you cannot set a total system bandwidth cap. You can set a per stream cap, but that doesn’t help if you have too many people accessing your server at once.

[-] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Maybe time to look into load balancers, e.g. nginx

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] spudwart@spudwart.com 5 points 7 months ago

Okay, this is obnoxious and all.

But what the hell is 'narcing'?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Aurix@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

While it should have been opt-in it is not that dramatic. The server owner can see what is played anyways. And since the primary use case is a home and friends setup it is vastly different to a Netflix scale privacy break.

[-] greater_potater@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yes, a server owner can see what is played. But this is sending email summaries about what I am watching on my own server. Even if that friend is not invited to my particular server, and even libraries that I haven't shared with anyone.

It doesn't even matter if I'm embarrassed by what it sends. That information is private. Period.

[-] okamiueru@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Are you saying that this information isn't collected by Plex for a use case that doesn't obviously require it? Because if it is the case, then it's a big fucking deal.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
702 points (96.8% liked)

Privacy

29777 readers
666 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS