this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
55 points (85.7% liked)

Privacy

32023 readers
1557 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I assume it not completely locked down, but does it mean Google doesn't have access to everything like I assume it does with Android?

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its not really meant for privacy. Its a great rom for keeping an old phone up and going but you should consider divestos or grapheneos if privacy is your main concern.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've heard graphene isn't maintained any longer than Google pixel updates. So 5 years.

[–] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is for security concerns, because all the firmware and driver are maintained by first party, so once the first party stopped maintaining firmware, there is no way for graphene to make the device as secure as a phone that is still in its support period.

At that point, you can try to switch to lineage to increase the life of your device.

That being said, graphene do offer extended support for some devices like pixel 4(XL) is still supported right now, but it made it very clear that it is "extended support", and it exist only to help user transition to their next device.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

At that point, you can try to switch to lineage to increase the life of your device.

Which basically brings me to my question, how is LineageOS for should I call it basic privacy.

[–] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is okay for privacy, especially if you dont have google app installed, but it is not security and privacy focused.

If you have google app installed I imagine it is probably as private as stock os on a pixel, but less secure. Graphene/calyx will definitely have better security and privacy than lineage with or without gapps.

But I understand there is other tradeoffs besides just security and privacy, like minimizng ewaste, cost, availability, etc.

[–] Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

From Kuketz - "Overall, LineageOS leaves neither a privacy-friendly nor really secure impression"

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's good for general computing, and if it's off the internet it's good for anything. But if it's networked don't trust it with things you're not comfortable being at higher risk.

So watch YouTube fine, banking maybe not

The context here is a phone that's no longer receiving hardware security updates, not lineage OS itself. If you put lineage on a modern phone getting updates, then I'd be comfortable using it as a standard phone doing all the standard things including online banking

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

You don't have privacy if some criminal has access to your phone.

[–] thecam@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

It is good for privacy as long you do not install Google Play Services and also do not download any apps that is bad for your privacy. However GrapheneOS is a better option which additional security benefits.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Even without explicit installation of GApps, Lineage still uses and connects to quite a few Google services in the background.

It's a great way of keeping older devices up to date, but not much more than that.

[–] DangerMouse@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, this is the crux of LineageOS. There is a fork called DivestOS that is more libré and reduces dependence on Google services, as well as having bootloader re-locking for some devices.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Divest is pretty great, I use it myself

[–] lickmysword@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd say neutral. Since you can install gapps (e.g. Playstore, gmail) for convenience and less privacy. Or microG instead of gapps.

[–] Tibert@compuverse.uk 0 points 1 year ago

You can't rely install that. There can be microg (not sure if it's in the distributed rom), but there is no system integration with microg, so G apps cannot work. Neither a lot of apps based on play services.

Microg however offers a modified LineageOs rom where they have installed the system integration for micro G. On that rom, the G apps and apps requiring G services do work.

Maybe it could be a bit more privacy friendly than using the direct Google services, but it still connects to Google to get some services for some apps.

[–] gamey@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

It's good as long as you don't install Goole play services but doesn't have some of the extras privacy centric roms people will recommend you (only usable on a Google Pixel) have.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

From what I get, if your phone is anything other than a Pixel still within supported lifetime, then LOS is decent. At that point it's mostly a hardware tradeoff (use a phone that all of has active lifetime support, is bootloader-relockable and has Custom ROM support) than a software one.