this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
290 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59087 readers
4280 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bratosch@lemm.ee 145 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 26 points 10 months ago (4 children)

You can at least pay (quite a lot less than a cable subscription) to remove them. It beats paying $80 a month for the great privilege of spending 30% of the time watching ads.

For now, of course.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 49 points 10 months ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Soon you’ll pay AND watch ads. Maybe there will be a free tier with 5 minute ad breaks, and paid tier with 1 minute ad breaks.

[–] snootchiebootchies@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I pay for premium and still have to watch all the sponsored crap within the video itself. I block all those channels manually so it's slowly getting better.

[–] Fog0555@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Have you tried using SponsorBlock?

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You can at least pay (quite a lot less than a cable subscription)

Well I should bloody well hope so, considering you also get far less than cable.

YouTube is still mostly amateur or indie content, most of it short-form, and most of it frankly just not very good. There's still stuff on there worth watching, and I know some people really do consume a lot of content on there in the manner of watching TV back in the day, but objectively it really isn't the same thing as professional studio content. I can watch some random guy in Ohio do a 15 minute review of some niche thing I'm interested in as much as anyone can, but there's no way I'd consider that worth the same value as a long form TV series or feature film.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Less? I'd argue YouTube gets you way more than cable

There's a buttload of high quality content

[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Tbh paying a package deal isn't actually the worst thing. I get netflix, sky sports, BT sports, movies, all channels, 1gb broadband and 1 unlimited data SIM. £100 pm.

Yes it's expensive but it's £55 for 1gb broadband anyway. They have a stranglehold over football/soccer that it's hard to get away from. Yes you can pirate the stream but it's not the same.

This has fuck all to do with YT but generally getting packages individually isn't cheaper sometimes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

No, full circle would be more and longer ads.

Anyway, I’m a Smart Tube User :)

[–] atomWood@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I certainly prefer fewer and longer ad breaks, over several short ones, but this still sucks.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Why prefer any of it...block em all and tell corporations to pound sand.

Don't negotiate with terrorists.

[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago (7 children)

This will probably pull down votes, but I really do want the discuss this honestly.

I despise ads. I block them on everything that I can. I am fine with anyone and everyone blocking anything they don't want to see.

What I don't understand is why everyone is so upset with YouTube for trying to get people watch ads?

They have to pay for all the infrastructure somehow and I'm sure it isn't cheap. What are they supposed to do?

This isn't rhetorical or argumentive, I'm genuinely asking what the ethical approach to maintaining this infrastructure is.

[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Personally, I don’t mind the idea of paying YouTube to remove ads. I’m pragmatic enough to understand that you don’t get shit for free, particularly when that shit is using unimaginable amounts of data.

What I object to is that the YT Premium family plan is now more than £20 a month.

For the cost of Disney+ and Apple TV+ I can watch semi-professional video makers talking at a camera for ten minutes. Video makers who aren’t getting paid all that much for what they do. Video makers who also include sponsors reads.

So I fired up the trusty VPN, “flew to Ukraine” and signed up for around £3 a month. Fuck ‘em.

The mad thing is; if there was a £5 a month tier that only removed ads and didn’t include YT Music, I’d sign up to that without question. I watch a good amount of YouTube content on my Apple TV; I’m happy to pay. But I’m not happy to pay what YT are asking.

[–] thoughts3rased@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 months ago

THANK YOU. I've been saying this for ages. I really wouldn't mind even £8 a month for the no ads since I spend a lot of time on YouTube, but I am in no way paying extra for bells and whistles I don't need. I already have Spotify, I don't want to and nor am I going to pay for an extra music service that I just won't use. I'm on an unlimited data plan for god's sake, I don't care about downloading videos.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

It's the progressive intrusion and shady tactics. Going from multiple short ads to fewer longer ads seems like a small step. But from the original of maybe a static banner ad to the multiple full screen pop-ups, moving banners, unclosable ads, and whatever other bullshit they pull, we've come a long fucking way. Add onto that, harvesting data for ads and being incentivized to do so questions security.

It's more a protest to marketing in general trying to face fuck the world for another penny and enshittified products or services gleefully ruining what was once good for a penny.

[–] JTheFox@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I know others have said previously, but for me I hate the amount of tracking and targeting that gets thrown into the ads that try to pull as much personal information from you as possible so they can make every cent from that info. I like to keep my life as private as I can online. YouTube by no means has any respect for that.

Having an ad here and there wouldn’t normally bother me so much if it also wasn’t for the complete lack of filtering YouTube does on what ads are “acceptable”. So many ads have been misleading, contain false information, and are just down right inappropriate. An ad for a product is fine but I really don’t want to listen to another ad with an AI voice telling me to buy a product that is a blatant scam. If they are this strict on making creators follow the YouTube Guidelines, they should make ads follow them too.

I do understand that things aren’t free and I do support the creators I watch with buying merch or through donations, wherever that may be (KoFi, Patreon, etc). I would pay for YouTube premium but it’s just way too much money for the little that I would actually benefit from it. I don’t need or want YouTube Music. I just don’t want to have ads. But for $18.99 a month, no thank you.

TL;DR: Too much tracking and privacy invasive, ads don’t follow YouTube’s own guidelines and too expensive just to simply stop ads.

[–] BadlyDrawnRhino@aussie.zone 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

On top of the tracking within the ads themselves, you also have all of the general usage data that Google sells. They're double-dipping.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I can’t recall a time in history before this last 10 hellish years where I’ve been required to watch ads. If CBS had required that I have some sort of pressure plate to make sure my ass was in the seat during the ad breaks they’d be getting hate too. They can serve all the ads they want, I can choose to watch them. They’re violating the 2nd part of it and incurring the hostility that they should. Everything is turning into a timeshare presentation.

[–] Kyval@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

My major grip with the current ads are that they are obtrusive and repetitive.

On broadcast TV, I dont mind ads as much because the shows were written, filmed, and edited with predictable ad breaks in mind. I have a good idea how long the ad break will be and when they happen. Makes it easy to plan bathroom breaks, drink refills, or discuss what we're watching.

On Youtube, the ads seemingly pop up at random, usually in the middle of a sentence. Sometimes, there will be 2 ad breaks, and other times, there are 4 ad breaks for similar videos. If youtube would make ads consistent (30 second ad break at the half way point for < 10 mins vids; 15 second at break at 1/3 of the way through the video and a second one at 2/3 of the video for 10 - 30 min vids; etc) and content creators would edit their vidoes for these predetermined ad breaks, they would be much more palatable.

I get that the ad pool is based on tracking data/video content, but watching the same pool of 3 or 4 ads makes me less likely to buy something. Throw in some random ads in there, too, to break up the monotony.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Drusas@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

YouTube premium is very expensive for what it is. It should be like $5 a month to be worth the value, for me personally.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ares35@kbin.social 75 points 10 months ago (5 children)

so, what? 4-5 minutes instead of 2? yea, that'll keep people watching.....

something else

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago (4 children)
[–] Alimentar@lemm.ee 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can vouch. This, revanced and ublock on all my different devices and I haven't seen an ad in years

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Anything for LG TVs? WebOS?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

YouTube is fully enshitified. Useless app.

I open the vanilla app on someone else's computer the other day. Not logged in, in private browser mode, and the algorithm was immediately suggesting clips from Fox News and one of those loser Ben Shapiro types.

Even trying to find videos now. The search results seem to be clogged up of junk. Used to use it all the time to find a 30 second video for how to do some procedure or something. Now every single video is 10 minutes long and it's some idiot talking for 9 minutes about something unrelated and somewhere in the video buried between bullshit is 1 minute of useful content.

Came to YouTube because it was faster and easier than reading the manual but that's just not the case anymore.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 10 months ago (6 children)

The new ads suck. It's so frustrating to use. I'm hoping a PiHole will get rid of em but I think I remember reading that Google does some nasty shit to dodge that

[–] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I use SmartTube on my Android TV and it hasn't run into any issues so far. If you can install 3rd party apps you might want to give it a try

[–] detinu@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Yep I have it too. For now it works flawlessly. Hopefully it doesn't take much from Google's userbase and they just leave it alone lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Spider89@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Google uses the same domain name, pi-hole can't block that.

Source: current pi-hole user.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Pihole only works when ads come from a third party add provider. It cannot tell the difference between YouTube videos and ads.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Smart tube is amazing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's odd... on my TV there are no youtube ads, and no sponsor messages.

https://github.com/yuliskov/smarttube

[–] Kittenstix@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I've been using grayjay, it certainly has some irritating bugs but they'll work out the kinks plus now I can watch twitch and kick with my screen off.

https://grayjay.app/

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

Not for me, 🚫ads + 🏴‍☠️

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

🏴‍☠️

[–] danielfgom@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They really can't seem to grasp the concept they what people prefer, if they have to watch ads, is 1 short ad per video.

Not multiple short ads per video nor 1 long ad. Just 1 short (15 seconds tops) ad and that's all.

They are going in the opposite direction

[–] sulgoth@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Oh they get it, there's no way they don't, they just want more Ad dollars with for less content that isn't giving them Ad dollars.They're looking for that sweet sweet middle ground where they can play more ads and you won't just stop watching.

[–] phourniner@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

Cool, more reason to use Grayjay or ReVanced

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

The Monkey's Paw has curled.

load more comments
view more: next ›