this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
-22 points (17.6% liked)

Programming

17450 readers
63 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
-22
Modern centralized version control systems? (self.programming)
submitted 11 months ago by Unsafe to c/programming@programming.dev
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

CVCSs are commonly used for monorepos and large repositories. The most popular FOSS option is Subversion, although it may not be favored by all programmers and users. Perforce is another option, but it is a proprietary system.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lung@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Uh obviously still git, which is used as a centralized repo 99% of the time. Why does this post read like it's AI generated?

[–] Unsafe 4 points 11 months ago

It has been translated by an AI, rather than generated by one.

[–] war@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I feel like this is a prank of some sort?

[–] Unsafe -2 points 11 months ago

Not really.

[–] java@beehaw.org 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sir, for how long have you been in a coma?

[–] Unsafe -1 points 11 months ago

41

[–] xoggy@programming.dev 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What is it you need that a centralized version control system offers that a distributed version control system doesn't? For instance you could use git or pijul for a monorepo.

[–] Unsafe 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ability to clone only certain parts of a repo. Git has shallow and partial clones, but they don't feel like the right tool for large/mono repos.

[–] lung@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Git provides subtree (and submodules) which enable this with some planning

[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

Git, Mercurial, Subversion, and Fossil are the ones i know. Git is so far in the lead it's hard to even mention the others in the same sentence.

[–] ck_@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe Fossil might be something for you.

[–] Unsafe -1 points 11 months ago

From what I understand, Fossil VCS is a distributed version control system, rather than being centralized.

[–] Lucien@hexbear.net 1 points 10 months ago

Mercurial?