Of course, the western capitalists have always used whatever tools they have at their disposal to exploit and oppress the global south. If they didn't, their class position and relative power would be eroded. A global south with independent and self-sufficient energy and food resources is a extreme threat to the international rules based order.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago

I’m glad I’m not the only one who thinks this

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

Nice $75/month paywall

[+] nekandro@lemmy.ml -12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

No shit? Rich countries want to rest on their laurels and put a token effort towards the climate problem.

If you want to see what kind of investment is needed to actually solve the climate problem, look at China.

No democracy is going to greenlight that level of spending.

[–] drkt@feddit.dk 24 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Just to clarify so that I don't misunderstand; are you using China as an example of a country with good climate change policies?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

While trying to claim China isn't rich or capitalistic...

[–] 1nk@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

I think, but don't hold me to it, they're talking on how since China isn't exactly democratic, things get pushed through a lot quicker, like climate policies. I wouldn't say it's China's intention to look like the "green superpower", just that it gives a better geopolitical look to China. Just to make clear, I don't support China, and likely never will without some national revolution and major reform (cough cough, fuck the CCP), only giving my thoughts.

[–] knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 8 months ago

Unironically yes.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

China, one of the most egregious polluters?