Pretty much every work contract I've ever had has had clauses in which would make this sort of behaviour gross misconduct, and a fireable offence.

And that is before we even get to destruction of evidence, obstruction, and failure to keep appropriate records whilst in public office.

How these pricks aren't being led out by their ears is, well, it's an overt example of rules for thee and not for me, but it still boils my piss.

It's a massive security risk. It's utterly fucking stupid for official business to be done using it.

It took me a bit to parse this title; at first I thought GCHQ was calling for the use of WhatsApp to end the government.

Unfortunately, with this government I've learnt their alternative would be to give another juicy contract to one of their lovers, school chums or donors.

I'm from Grimsby, and he needs to stop wearing that hat, we're ashamed of him.

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Speaking in evidence to a new parliamentary inquiry and as the UK heads into a general election year, Omand said the complexities and nuances of “any decent strategic analysis … cannot be conveyed in a WhatsApp exchange”.

Omand, who is also a professor of war studies and a senior adviser to a cyber-investment business, said in his evidence that ministers and officials often engaged in “gossip” and “informal exchanges” as they gathered for cabinet meetings, which helped let off steam when pressure had built up.

The use of WhatsApp by ministers has been under intense scrutiny since it emerged that Boris Johnson’s government used group chats to make decisions and discuss issues of critical national importance in the pandemic.

During the Covid era, Johnson’s government sidelined the usual Cabinet Office Briefing Room A (Cobra) process of emergency crisis management in favour of a new system of committees.

Omand said: “Without prejudice to [the Covid inquiry’s] future findings, I suggest that it was not sensible, whatever the frustrations, to scorn that system, well understood in Whitehall, local government and the devolved administrations, in place of ad hoc management of a major crisis from a few offices in No 10.

In separate evidence to the liaison subcommittee, another former permanent secretary, Jonathan Slater, called for government strategic thinking to be subject to more public scrutiny in real time.

The original article contains 1,006 words, the summary contains 226 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

In other news, water is wet; pictures at 11:00pm.